Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Onabotulinumtoxin a injection with or without hydrodistension for treatment of bladder pain syndrome.
Mateu Arrom, Laura; Gutierrez Ruiz, Cristina; Palou, Joan; Errando-Smet, Carlos.
  • Mateu Arrom L; Functional and Female Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, C/Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain. lmateuarrom@hotmail.com.
  • Gutierrez Ruiz C; Functional and Female Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, C/Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Palou J; Functional and Female Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, C/Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Errando-Smet C; Chief of the Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, C/Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Int Urogynecol J ; 32(5): 1213-1219, 2021 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32725367
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Onabotulinumtoxin A (BoNT-A) injection has been used for bladder pain syndrome (BPS) treatment with good results. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of BoNT-A injection with or without hydrodistension (HD).

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of patients treated with BoNT-A injection with or without HD because of BPS between 2008 and 2014 in our department. One hundred U of Botox® was injected in the trigone and 100 U in the bladder wall. Follow-up included a VAS of pain (0-10), a patient satisfaction scale (0-10) and a treatment benefit scale (1-2 response to treatment; 3-4 non-response to treatment). Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. BoNT-A retreatment was offered at the patient's request. Reasons for non-retreatment request were collected. Postoperative outcomes were compared between BoNT-A and BoNT-A + HD.

RESULTS:

Forty-one patients were included (39 females, 2 males), median age 73 years (69-78.5). Reduction in VAS, postoperative VAS = 0, satisfaction with surgery and responders to treatment were significantly higher after BoNT-A + HD (n = 26) than after BoNT-A (n = 15). Eleven (26.8%) complications (CD ≤ 2) were detected, with no differences between treatment groups. Mean follow-up was 153 (± 83) months. Twelve (46.2%) patients in the BoNT-A + HD group and seven (46.7%) patients in the BoNT-A group requested retreatment. Lack of severe pain was a common reason for treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION:

BoNT-A injection could represent a safe and effective BPS treatment. BoNT-A + HD seems to be better than BoNT-A alone for pain relief, with no significant additional morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cistitis Intersticial / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cistitis Intersticial / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article