Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Free-breathing liver fat and R2 quantification using motion-corrected averaging based on a nonlocal means algorithm.
Luo, Huiwen; Zhu, Ante; Wiens, Curtis N; Starekova, Jitka; Shimakawa, Ann; Reeder, Scott B; Johnson, Kevin M; Hernando, Diego.
  • Luo H; Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Zhu A; Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Wiens CN; Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Starekova J; Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Shimakawa A; Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Reeder SB; Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Johnson KM; Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Hernando D; Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA.
Magn Reson Med ; 85(2): 653-666, 2021 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32738089
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To propose a motion-robust chemical shift-encoded (CSE) method with high signal-to-noise (SNR) for accurate quantification of liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2∗ .

METHODS:

A free-breathing multi-repetition 2D CSE acquisition with motion-corrected averaging using nonlocal means (NLM) was proposed. PDFF and R2∗ quantified with 2D CSE-NLM were compared to two alternative 2D techniques direct averaging and single acquisition (2D 1ave) in a digital phantom. Further, 2D NLM was compared in patients to 3D techniques (standard breath-hold, free-breathing and navigated), and the alternative 2D techniques. A reader study and quantitative analysis (Bland-Altman, correlation analysis, paired Student's t-test) were performed to evaluate the image quality and assess PDFF and R2∗ measurements in regions of interest.

RESULTS:

In simulations, 2D NLM resulted in lower standard deviations (STDs) of PDFF (2.7%) and R2∗ (8.2  s-1 ) compared to direct averaging (PDFF 3.1%, R2∗ 13.6  s-1 ) and 2D 1ave (PDFF 8.7%, R2∗ 33.2  s-1 ). In patients, 2D NLM resulted in fewer motion artifacts than 3D free-breathing and 3D navigated, less signal loss than 2D direct averaging, and higher SNR than 2D 1ave. Quantitatively, the STDs of PDFF and R2∗ of 2D NLM were comparable to those of 2D direct averaging (p>0.05). 2D NLM reduced bias, particularly in R2∗ (-5.73 to -0.36  s-1 ) that arises in direct averaging (-3.96 to 11.22  s-1 ) in the presence of motion.

CONCLUSIONS:

2D CSE-NLM enables accurate mapping of PDFF and R2∗ in the liver during free-breathing.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Hígado Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Hígado Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article