[Evaluation of outpatient medical pain management in Germany : Results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey among pain specialists in outpatient departments]. / Bewertung der ambulanten ärztlichen Schmerztherapie in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer internetbasierten Querschnittsbefragung unter ambulant tätigen Schmerzmedizinern.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: On 31 December 2016, a total of 1206 physicians participated in the outpatient care of chronic pain patients according to the criteria of a special pain management program (QSV). Because of the largely existing shortage of treatment resources for chronic pain patients, there is a lack of data regarding the evaluation of outpatient pain management by highly specialized pain therapists. METHODS: In a hybrid Delphi procedure, a questionnaire concerning the content, structural and personal assessment of outpatient pain management in Germany was developed. With the help of this instrument, an internet-based cross-sectional survey of 281 QSV pain therapists from four German states (Berlin, Lower Saxony, Saxony, Baden-Württemberg) and of all the heads of university outpatient pain services (n = 36) in Germany was conducted. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate of the survey was 35.9%. The response rate of the heads of university outpatient pain services was 66.7%. In 91% of the respondents the proportion of chronic pain patients in the medical practices was more than 70%. Whereas 67.3% were satisfied with the situation in their medical practice, 63.4% were dissatisfied with the current organizational structure of the pain management in Germany. They expressed their dissatisfaction especially in terms of budgeting regulations (69.3%), the cooperation with psychotherapists (69.3%) and interdisciplinary networking (50.5%). The 1­year specialist training in pain management (87.1%) and the completion of a psychosomatic basic care course (90.1%) were assessed as a good preparation for the later profession. A multitude of free comments indicated that the pain specialist training is too short and insufficient. Most of the respondents considered the establishment of a specialist board certification for pain management more suitable from the perspective of physicians (61.4%) and the patients (54.5%). Of the heads of university outpatient pain services 70.8% expressed the wish for autonomous structures with separate budgets and 75.0% indicated that under the current conditions their outpatient pain services are not working profitably. Only 39.7% of the QSV pain therapists provided fellowship training for physicians and 57.6% were planning to retire during the next 10 years. CONCLUSION: Highly specialized pain therapists are dissatisfied because of the lack of independence of the organizational structure of pain management care and the insufficient interdisciplinary network in outpatient pain management. A possible solution for a better pain management care and the recruitment problems may be the establishment of a board certification for pain management.