Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility and acceptability evaluation of the Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention for living well with dementia.
Csipke, Emese; Moniz-Cook, Esme; Leung, Phuong; Yates, Lauren; Birt, Linda; Walton, Holly; Hogervorst, Eef; Mountain, Gail; Charlesworth, Georgina; Orrell, Martin.
  • Csipke E; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Moniz-Cook E; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
  • Leung P; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
  • Yates L; Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Birt L; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Walton H; Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
  • Hogervorst E; National Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
  • Mountain G; Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
  • Charlesworth G; Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
  • Orrell M; Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 33(6): 601-614, 2021 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32847643
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Post-diagnostic psychosocial interventions could play an important role in supporting people with mild dementia remain independent. The Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) intervention was developed to address this.

METHOD:

The mixed methods non-randomized, pre-post feasibility study occurred across England. Facilitators were recruited from the voluntary sector and memory services. Participants and their supporters took part in the three-session intervention. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and follow-up. To evaluate acceptability, focus groups and interviews were conducted with a subsample of participants and facilitators.

RESULTS:

Contextual challenges to delivery including national research governance changes, affected recruitment of study sites. Thirty-four dyads consented, with 14 facilitators providing the intervention. Dyads took part in at least two sessions (79%), and 73% in all three. Outcome measures were completed by 79% without difficulty, with minimal missing data. No significant changes were found on pre and post assessments. Post hoc analysis found moderate effect size improvements for self-management (SMAS instrument) in people with dementia (d = 0.41) and quality of life (EQ5D measure) in carers (d = 0.40). Qualitative data indicated that dyads found PRIDE acceptable, as did intervention facilitators.

CONCLUSIONS:

The three-session intervention was well accepted by participant-dyads and intervention facilitators. A randomized controlled trial of PRIDE would need to carefully consider recruitment potential across geographically varied settings and site stratification according to knowledge of contextual factors, such as the diversity of post-diagnostic services across the country. Letting sites themselves be responsible for identifying suitable intervention facilitators was successful. The self-report measures showed potential to be included in the main trial.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Aceptación de la Atención de Salud / Cuidadores / Demencia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Aceptación de la Atención de Salud / Cuidadores / Demencia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article