Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of dialysis modality choice on the survival of end-stage renal disease patients in southern China: a retrospective cohort study.
He, Zhiren; Hou, Haijing; Zhang, Difei; Mo, Yenan; Zhang, La; Su, Guobin; Lin, Junjie; Lu, Liming; Huang, Jingyao; Gu, Yewen; Zhang, Ying; Lin, Jingxia; Yuan, Fengling; Peng, Yu; Liang, Hui; Zhao, Daixin; Lu, Fuhua; Liu, Xusheng; Wang, Lixin.
  • He Z; Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
  • Hou H; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhang D; Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
  • Mo Y; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhang; Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China. zdf_doctor@163.com.
  • Su G; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. zdf_doctor@163.com.
  • Lin J; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Lu L; Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
  • Huang J; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Gu Y; Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhang Y; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Lin J; Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
  • Yuan F; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Peng Y; Clinical Research and Data Center, South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Medical College of Acu-Moxi and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Liang H; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhao D; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Lu F; The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Liu X; Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), No. 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
  • Wang L; The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
BMC Nephrol ; 21(1): 412, 2020 09 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972378
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The optimal choice of treatment, with hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, is still controversial. Only a few studies comparing HD and PD have been conducted in China, which has the largest number of dialysis patients in the world.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on ESRD patients who began renal replacement treatment from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 in Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine. Propensity scoring match was applied to balance the baseline conditions and multivariate Cox regression analysis to compare the mortality between HD and PD patients, and evaluated the correlation between mortality and various baseline characteristics.

RESULTS:

A total of 436 HD patients and 501 PD patients were included in this study, and PD patients had better survival than HD patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. For younger ESRD patients (≤60-year-old), the overall survival of PD was better than that of HD, but HD was associated with a lower risk of death in older patients (> 70-year-old). This difference was still significant after adjustment for a variety of confounding factors. Female gender, age at dialysis initiation, cardiovascular disease, cholesterol, and HD were risk factors of all-cause mortality in the younger subgroup, while PD was risk factor in the older subgroup.

CONCLUSION:

PD may be a better choice for younger ESRD patients, and HD for the older patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diálisis Renal / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diálisis Renal / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article