Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of Protocolized Care in ARDS Improves Outcomes.
Duggal, Abhijit; Panitchote, Anupol; Siuba, Matthew; Krishnan, Sudhir; Torbic, Heather; Hastings, Andrei; Mehkri, Omar; Hanane, Tarik; Hatipoglu, Umur; Hite, R Duncan; Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo.
  • Duggal A; Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. duggala2@ccf.org.
  • Panitchote A; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
  • Siuba M; Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Krishnan S; Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Torbic H; Department of Pharmacology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Hastings A; Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Mehkri O; Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Hanane T; Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Hatipoglu U; Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Hite RD; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Mireles-Cabodevila E; Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Respir Care ; 66(4): 600-609, 2021 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33051253
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Treatments for ARDS that improve patient outcomes include use of lung-protective ventilation, prone ventilation, and conservative fluid management. Implementation of ARDS protocols via educational programs might improve adherence and outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of an ARDS protocol implementation on outcomes and adherence with ARDS guidelines.

METHODS:

This was a single-center, interventional, comparative study before and after protocol implementation. Staff education for the ARDS protocol was implemented between June 2014 and May 2015. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted during between January 2012 and May 2014 (pre-protocol) and between June 2015 and June 2017 (post-protocol). A total of 450 subjects with ARDS were included. After propensity score matching, 432 subjects were analyzed. Of those, 330 subjects were treated after protocol implementation.

RESULTS:

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) plateau pressure and tidal volume over the first 3 d decreased significantly after protocol implementation (30.5 [IQR 24.2-33] vs 25.5 [IQR 21.7-30], P = .01 and 7.65 vs 7.4 mL/kg predicted body weight, P = .032, respectively). The percentage of subjects with unsafe tidal volume (> 10 mL/kg predicted body weight) decreased (14.4% vs 5.8%, P = .02). The percentage of subjects with safe plateau pressure (≤ 30 cm H2O) increased (47.4% vs 76.5%, P < .001). PEEP deviation from the ARDSNet PEEP/[Formula see text] table was significantly lower after the implementation. Mortality at 28 and 90 days improved after implementation (53.9% vs 41.8% and 61.8% vs 48.2%, respectively). Adjusted odds ratios for 28-d and 90-d mortality were 0.47 (95% CI 0.28-0.78) and 0.45 (95% CI 0.27-0.76), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

ARDS protocol implementation was associated with improved survival and rate of adherence.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article