Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delayed Visits for Contraception Due to Concerns Regarding Pelvic Examination Among Women with History of Intimate Partner Violence.
Holt, Hunter K; Sawaya, George F; El Ayadi, Alison M; Henderson, Jillian T; Rocca, Corinne H; Westhoff, Carolyn L; Harper, Cynthia C.
  • Holt HK; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Hunter.Holt@ucsf.edu.
  • Sawaya GF; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • El Ayadi AM; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Henderson JT; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Rocca CH; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Westhoff CL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Harper CC; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(7): 1883-1889, 2021 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33145695
BACKGROUND: Concern regarding pelvic examinations may be more common among women experiencing intimate partner violence. OBJECTIVE: We examined women's attitudes towards pelvic examination with history of intimate partner violence (pressured to have sex, or verbal, or physical abuse). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized trial on contraceptive access. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 18-25 were recruited at 40 reproductive health centers across the USA (2011-2013). MAIN MEASURES: Delays in clinic visits for contraception and preference to avoid pelvic examinations, by history of ever experiencing pressured sex, verbal, or physical abuse from a sexual partner, reported by frequency (never, rarely, sometimes, often). We used multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations for clustered data. KEY RESULTS: A total of 1490 women were included. Ever experiencing pressured sex was reported by 32.4% of participants, with 16.5% reporting it rarely, 12.1% reporting it sometimes, and 3.8% reporting it often. Ever experiencing verbal abuse was reported by 19.4% and physical abuse by 10.2% of participants. Overall, 13.2% of participants reported ever having delayed going to the clinic for contraception to avoid having a pelvic examination, and 38.2% reported a preference to avoid pelvic examinations. In multivariable analysis, women reporting that they experienced pressured sex often had significantly higher odds of delaying a clinic visit for birth control (aOR 3.10 95% CI 1.39-6.84) and for reporting a preference to avoid pelvic examinations (aOR 2.91 95% CI 1.57-5.40). We found no associations between delay of clinic visits or preferences to avoid a pelvic examination and verbal or physical abuse. CONCLUSIONS: History of pressured sex from an intimate partner is common. Among women who have experienced pressured sex, concern regarding pelvic examinations is a potential barrier to contraception. Communicating that routine pelvic examinations are no longer recommended by professional societies could potentially reduce barriers and increase preventive healthcare visits.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Examen Ginecologíco / Violencia de Pareja Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Examen Ginecologíco / Violencia de Pareja Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article