Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pretreatments of Broussonetia papyrifera: in vitro assessment on gas and methane production, fermentation characteristic, and methanogenic archaea profile.
Dong, Lifeng; Gao, Yanhua; Jing, Xuelan; Guo, Huiping; Zhang, Hongsen; Lai, Qi; Diao, Qiyu.
  • Dong L; Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Sino-US Joint Lab on Nutrition and Metabolism of Ruminant/ CAAS-CIAT Joint Laboratory in Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China.
  • Gao Y; College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Jing X; Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Sino-US Joint Lab on Nutrition and Metabolism of Ruminant/ CAAS-CIAT Joint Laboratory in Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China.
  • Guo H; College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
  • Zhang H; College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
  • Lai Q; College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Diao Q; Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Sino-US Joint Lab on Nutrition and Metabolism of Ruminant/ CAAS-CIAT Joint Laboratory in Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China.
Anim Biosci ; 35(9): 1367-1378, 2022 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33171029
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The present study was conducted to examine the gas production, fermentation characteristics, nutrient degradation, and methanogenic community composition of a rumen fluid culture with Broussonetia papyrifera (B. papyrifera) subjected to ensiling or steam explosion (SE) pretreatment.

METHODS:

Fresh B. papyrifera was collected and pretreated by ensiling or SE, which was then fermented with ruminal fluids as ensiled B. papyrifera group, steam-exploded B. papyrifera group, and untreated B. papyrifera group. The gas and methane production, fermentation characteristics, nutrient degradation, and methanogenic community were determined during the fermentation.

RESULTS:

Cumulative methane production was significantly improved with SE pretreatment compared with ensiled or untreated biomass accompanied with more volatile fatty acids production. After 72 h incubation, SE and ensiling pretreatments decreased the acid detergent fiber contents by 39.4% and 22.9%, and neutral detergent fiber contents by 10.6% and 47.2%, respectively. Changes of methanogenic diversity and abundance of methanogenic archaea corresponded to the variations in fermentation pattern and methane production.

CONCLUSION:

Compared with ensiling pretreatment, SE can be a promising technique for the efficient utilization of B. papyrifera, which would contribute to sustainable livestock production systems.
Palabras clave