Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Extracorporeal life support in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock - Design and rationale of the ECLS-SHOCK trial.
Thiele, Holger; Freund, Anne; Gimenez, Maria Rubini; de Waha-Thiele, Suzanne; Akin, Ibrahim; Pöss, Janine; Feistritzer, Hans-Josef; Fuernau, Georg; Graf, Tobias; Nef, Holger; Hamm, Christian; Böhm, Michael; Lauten, Alexander; Schulze, P Christian; Voigt, Ingo; Nordbeck, Peter; Felix, Stephan B; Abel, Peter; Baldus, Stephan; Laufs, Ulrich; Lenk, Karsten; Landmesser, Ulf; Skurk, Carsten; Pieske, Burkert; Tschöpe, Carsten; Hennersdorf, Marcus; Wengenmayer, Tobias; Preusch, Michael; Maier, Lars S; Jung, Christian; Kelm, Malte; Clemmensen, Peter; Westermann, Dirk; Seidler, Tim; Schieffer, Bernhard; Rassaf, Tienush; Mahabadi, Amir-Abbas; Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca; Meincke, Felix; Seyfarth, Melchior; Kersten, Alexander; Rottbauer, Wolfgang; Boekstegers, Peter; Muellenbach, Ralf; Dengler, Thomas; Kadel, Christoph; Schempf, Benjamin; Karagiannidis, Christian; Hopf, Hans-Bernd; Lehmann, Ralf.
  • Thiele H; Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: holger.thiele@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Freund A; Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Gimenez MR; Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
  • de Waha-Thiele S; University Heart Center Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Akin I; University Clinic Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Pöss J; Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Feistritzer HJ; Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Fuernau G; University Heart Center Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Graf T; University Heart Center Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Nef H; University Clinic Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
  • Hamm C; University Clinic Giessen, Giessen, Germany; Kerckhoff Clinic Bad Nauheim, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
  • Böhm M; University Clinic Homburg, Homburg, Germany.
  • Lauten A; Helios Clinic Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
  • Schulze PC; University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Voigt I; Contilia Elisabeth-Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany, Essen, Germany.
  • Nordbeck P; University Clinic Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Felix SB; Dept. of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Abel P; Dept. of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Baldus S; Heart Center Cologne, University Clinic Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Laufs U; University Clinic Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Lenk K; University Clinic Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Landmesser U; Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Skurk C; Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Pieske B; Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow Klinikum and German Heart Center and Berlin Brandenburger Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) of the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
  • Tschöpe C; Charité University Medicine, Campus Virchow Klinikum and German Heart Center and Berlin Brandenburger Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) of the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
  • Hennersdorf M; SLK-Clinic Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany.
  • Wengenmayer T; University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Preusch M; University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Maier LS; University Clinic Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Jung C; University Clinic Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Kelm M; University Clinic Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Clemmensen P; University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Westermann D; University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Seidler T; Heart Center Göttingen, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Schieffer B; University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Rassaf T; Dept. of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart- and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
  • Mahabadi AA; Dept. of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart- and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
  • Vasa-Nicotera M; University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Meincke F; Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Seyfarth M; Heart Center Wuppertal; Witten-Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany.
  • Kersten A; University Clinic Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
  • Rottbauer W; University Clinic Ulm, Ulm Germany.
  • Boekstegers P; Helios Clinic Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany.
  • Muellenbach R; Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
  • Dengler T; SLK Clinic Bad Friedrichshall, Bad Friedrichshall, Germany.
  • Kadel C; Clinic Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Schempf B; Clinic Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
  • Karagiannidis C; ARDS and ECMO Center Cologne-Merheim, Cologne, Germany.
  • Hopf HB; Asklepios Clinic Langen, Langen, Germany.
  • Lehmann R; Asklepios Clinic Langen, Langen, Germany.
Am Heart J ; 234: 1-11, 2021 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33428901
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted. STUDY

DESIGN:

The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 11 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke.

CONCLUSIONS:

The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea / Infarto del Miocardio / Revascularización Miocárdica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea / Infarto del Miocardio / Revascularización Miocárdica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article