Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pru p 3 Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Lipid Transfer Protein Syndrome: Is It Worth?
Beitia, Juan María; Vega Castro, Arantza; Cárdenas, Remedios; Peña-Arellano, Maria Isabel.
  • Beitia JM; Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.
  • Vega Castro A; ARADyAL Spanish Thematic Network and Co-operative Research Centre RD16/0006/0023, Spain.
  • Cárdenas R; Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain, avega@sescam.jccm.es.
  • Peña-Arellano MI; ARADyAL Spanish Thematic Network and Co-operative Research Centre RD16/0006/0023, Spain, avega@sescam.jccm.es.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 182(5): 447-454, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33588417
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) syndrome is an important cause of multiple plant food allergy in the Mediterranean area. The effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with the LTP Pru p 3 extract has been little investigated in the real-world setting. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of Pru p 3 SLIT in real-life patients with LTP syndrome with/without concurrent reactions to peanut and/or nuts.

METHODS:

This was a prospective real-life study including all patients diagnosed with LTP allergy and treated with Pru p 3 SLIT between 2011 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital in Spain. Patients underwent open oral food challenge (OFC) tests for unpeeled peach and nuts/peanuts 1 year after the treatment started to assess food tolerance. A control group of patients diagnosed with LTP allergy who refused treatment with immunotherapy were included. Severity of symptoms and diet avoidance was recorded in both groups.

RESULTS:

Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 24.7 years (range 5.5-43.1) were included 100% were allergic to fruit; 72%, to peanut and/or nuts; 19 had a history of severe systemic reactions. Seven patients discontinued therapy; 3 (10%), due to adverse events. One year after SLIT start, 16 (73%) patients had negative OFC to peach; 95%, after 2 years; 69% had negative OFC to nuts/peanuts. The control group included 13 patients 53.8% experienced reactions with new foods; severity of symptoms increased significantly (p < 0.001), and diet restrictions were maintained in this group.

CONCLUSIONS:

SLIT with Pru p 3 shows a good safety profile, and avoid dietary restrictions in patients with LTP syndrome treated in the real-life setting.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteínas de Plantas / Alérgenos / Proteínas Portadoras / Antígenos de Plantas / Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteínas de Plantas / Alérgenos / Proteínas Portadoras / Antígenos de Plantas / Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article