Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing cost, growth performance, and nutrient absorption with a bio-emulsifier based on lysophospholipids for broiler chickens.
Haetinger, V S; Dalmoro, Y K; Godoy, G L; Lang, M B; de Souza, O F; Aristimunha, P; Stefanello, C.
  • Haetinger VS; Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul 97105-900, Brazil.
  • Dalmoro YK; Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul 97105-900, Brazil.
  • Godoy GL; Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul 97105-900, Brazil.
  • Lang MB; Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul 97105-900, Brazil.
  • de Souza OF; Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul 97105-900, Brazil.
  • Aristimunha P; Kemin Industries Inc., Animal Nutrition & Health Division, South America, Indaiatuba, São Paulo 13347-394, Brazil.
  • Stefanello C; Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul 97105-900, Brazil. Electronic address: catarina.stefanello@ufsm.br.
Poult Sci ; 100(4): 101025, 2021 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33652240
ABSTRACT
Two experiments (Exp.) were conducted to evaluate effects of a lysophospholipid-based bio-emulsifier (LPL) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and energy utilization of broilers as well as the return on investment (ROI). In Exp. 1, 392 chicks were housed in battery cages in a completely randomized design with 8 treatments and 7 replicates of 7 birds each from d 0 to 21 posthatch. In Exp. 2, 1,400 chicks were allocated in floor pens and fed the same 8 treatments, with 7 replicates and 25 birds each from d 0 to 43 posthatch. Treatments consisted of 6 degummed soybean oil-based diets positive control (PC1); PC1 formulated with 500 g/ton LPL (PC1+LPL on top); PC1 formulated with 60 kcal LPL matrix (PC1+LPL60); PC1 formulated with 100 kcal LPL matrix (PC1+LPL100); and two negative controls NC-60 and NC-100 with reductions of 60 and 100 kcal/kg ME, respectively. Two other diets were formulated with acid soybean oil positive control (PC2) and PC2 formulated with 60 kcal LPL matrix (PC2+LPL60). In Exp. 1, performance was evaluated from d 0 to 21, ME and ileal digestibility of DM, CP and energy were determined on d 21. In Exp. 2, growth performance was evaluated from d 0 to 42, and on d 43 carcass and abdominal fat yields were calculated. There were no effects of soybean oil sources in any parameter. Inclusion of LPL increased (P < 0.05) BW gain and ileal digestibility of DM, fat and CP. Broilers fed the PC1+LPL on top diet had increased (P < 0.05) performance, ileal digestibility and energy utilization as well as decreased abdominal fat compared to NC-60 or NC-100. The use of LPL on top had a ROI of 81 vs. PC1, considering the gains in revenue of the slaughtered broilers in relation to the investment with LPL in feed. In conclusion, a lysophospholipid-based bio-emulsifier increased performance, digestibility and return on investment of broilers fed standard or reformulated diets.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pollos / Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Animals Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pollos / Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Animals Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article