Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of cesarean section rates in two German hospitals applying the 10-Group Classification System.
Pulvermacher, Christina; Van de Vondel, Patricia; Gerzen, Lydia; Gembruch, Ulrich; Welchowski, Thomas; Schmid, Matthias; Merz, Waltraut M.
  • Pulvermacher C; Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Van de Vondel P; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Porz am Rhein Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
  • Gerzen L; Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Gembruch U; Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Welchowski T; Department of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Schmid M; Department of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Merz WM; Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Perinat Med ; 49(7): 818-829, 2021 Sep 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827151
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

In Germany, cesarean section (CS) rates more than doubled within the past two decades. For analysis, auditing and inter-hospital comparison, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) is recommended. We used the TGCS to analyze CS rates in two German hospitals of different levels of care.

METHODS:

From October 2017 to September 2018, data were prospectively collected. Unit A is a level three university hospital, unit B a level one district hospital. The German birth registry was used for comparison with national data. We performed two-sample Z tests and bootstrapping to compare aggregated (unit A + B) with national data and unit A with unit B.

RESULTS:

In both datasets (national data and aggregated data unit A + B), Robson group (RG) 5 was the largest contributor to the overall CS rate. Compared to national data, group sizes in RG 1 and 3 were significantly smaller in the units under investigation, RG 8 and 10 significantly larger. Total CS rates between the two units differed (40.7 vs. 28.4%, p<0.001). The CS rate in RG 5 and RG 10 was different (p<0.01 for both). The most relative frequent RG in both units consisted of group 5, followed by group 10 and 2a.

CONCLUSIONS:

The analysis allowed us to explain different CS rates with differences in the study population and with differences in the clinical practice. These results serve as a starting point for audits, inter-hospital comparisons and for interventions aiming to reduce CS rates.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cesárea / Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Hospitales de Distrito / Hospitales Universitarios Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cesárea / Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Hospitales de Distrito / Hospitales Universitarios Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article