Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as an Augmentation Intervention for the Attenuation of Motor Deficits in Patients With Stroke.
Pinto, Ekta Franscina; Gupta, Anupam; Kulkarni, Girish Baburao; Andrade, Chittaranjan.
  • Pinto EF; From the Departments of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurotoxicology.
  • Gupta A; Neurological Rehabilitation.
  • Kulkarni GB; Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
  • Andrade C; From the Departments of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurotoxicology.
J ECT ; 37(4): 281-290, 2021 12 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33840803
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Most studies of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for motor deficits in patients with stroke administered few sessions of tDCS and with low current amplitude.

METHODS:

During 2015 to 2019, we randomized 60 inpatients with ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke and motor deficits to true or sham tDCS. Transcranial direct current stimulation was administered at 2- to 3-mA current strength, twice daily, 6 days a week, for 2 weeks; anode and cathode were placed over ipsilesional and contralesional motor cortices, respectively. All patients received individualized motor and cognitive rehabilitation. Motor outcomes were assessed 1 day before and 1 day after the tDCS course using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, the Jebson-Taylor Hand Function Test, and the Barthel index (all coprimary outcomes). Mood and cognition were also assessed. Motor outcomes were compared between groups using age, baseline scores, and latency to treatment as covariates. The study was prospectively registered (CTRI/2017/01/007733).

RESULTS:

The mean age of the patients was 46.9 years. The sample was 73.3% male. Six patients did not complete the study. The covariates were significantly related to motor outcomes. Although all patients showed motor improvements, after adjusting for covariates, tDCS was not superior to sham treatment on any motor, mood, or cognitive outcome. Laterality of hemispheric lesion influenced spatial but not motor outcomes with tDCS. One true tDCS patient developed blistering under the anode and was withdrawn from the study; 3 more reported transient itching during sessions.

CONCLUSIONS:

An intensive course of tDCS, as delivered in this study, does not improve motor, mood, and cognitive outcomes in ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke in patients undergoing individualized rehabilitation. The study provides important leads for directions for future research.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidente Cerebrovascular / Terapia Electroconvulsiva / Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa / Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidente Cerebrovascular / Terapia Electroconvulsiva / Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa / Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article