Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Survival Following Margin-Positive Resection for Pancreatic Cancer.
Chopra, Asmita; Zenati, Mazen; Hogg, Melissa E; Zeh, Herbert J; Bartlett, David L; Bahary, Nathan; Zureikat, Amer H; Beane, Joal D.
  • Chopra A; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Zenati M; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Hogg ME; Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Zeh HJ; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Bartlett DL; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Bahary N; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Zureikat AH; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Beane JD; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. joaldbeane@gmail.com.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(12): 7759-7769, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34027585
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A positive microscopic margin (R1) following resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can occur in up to 80% of patients and is associated with reduced survival and increased recurrence. Our aim was to characterize the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) on survival and recurrence in patients with PDAC following an R1 resection.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of patients with PDAC who underwent pancreatectomy from 2008 to 2017 was performed. Patients were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition and stratified based on resection margin (R0 vs. R1) and treatment sequence (NAT vs. surgery first [SF]). Conditional survival analysis was performed using Cox regression and inverse probability weighted estimates.

RESULTS:

Among 580 patients, 59% received NAT and 41% underwent SF. On final pathology, the NAT cohort had smaller tumors and less lymph node (LN) positivity (p < 0.05). NAT was not associated with an R1 resection (50%, p = 0.653). Compared with the R1 cohort, the R0 cohort had a higher median overall survival (OS; 39.6 vs. 22.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.6, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS; 19 vs. 13 months; HR 1.35, p = 0.004). After risk adjustment, NAT was not associated with OS, regardless of margin status (R0, 95% confidence interval [CI] (-)7.31-27.07, p = 0.26; or R1, 95% CI (-)36.99-15.25, p = 0.42). However, NAT was associated with improved DFS in the R1 cohort (95% CI 1.79-11.91, p = 0.008) but not in the R0 cohort (95% CI (-)11.22-10.54, p = 0.95).

CONCLUSION:

An R0 resection remains an important determinant of overall and disease-free survival, even when NAT is administered. For patients with an R1 resection, receipt of NAT may prolong DFS.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article