Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dynamic esophageal patency assessment: an effective method for prenatally diagnosing esophageal atresia.
Kassif, Eran; Elkan Miller, Tal; Tsur, Abraham; Trozky, Yana; Gur, Tomer; De Castro, Hila; Hadi, Efrat; Yulzari, Vered; Weissmann-Brenner, Alina; Messing, Baruch; Yoeli-Ullman, Rakefet; Sharon, Roni; Mazaki-Tovi, Shali; Achiron, Reuven; Weisz, Boaz; Weissbach, Tal.
  • Kassif E; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Elkan Miller T; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Tsur A; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Trozky Y; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Gur T; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • De Castro H; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Hadi E; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Yulzari V; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Weissmann-Brenner A; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Messing B; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Yoeli-Ullman R; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Sharon R; Department of Neurology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Mazaki-Tovi S; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Achiron R; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Weisz B; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Weissbach T; Diagnostic Ultrasound Unit of the Institute of Obstetrical and Gynecological Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: ferbyt@gmail.com.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(6): 674.e1-674.e12, 2021 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34146530
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Esophageal atresia is a major anomaly with a low prenatal detection rate. We propose a sonographic method termed dynamic esophageal patency assessment.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of the dynamic esophageal patency assessment in a high-risk population. STUDY

DESIGN:

A prospective study was conducted in a single tertiary fetal ultrasound unit for 12 months. The study group included pregnant women referred for a targeted scan because of one or more of the following (1) polyhydramnios; (2) small or absent stomach; (3) vertebral, anal atresia, cardiac, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal, and limb abnormalities; (4) first-degree relative with esophageal atresia; and (5) genetic mutation associated with esophageal atresia. In addition to dynamic esophageal patency assessment, a comprehensive anomaly scan was carried out. The fetal esophagus was observed during swallowing. Cases that demonstrated uninterrupted fluid propagation through the esophagus were classified as normal. Cases that demonstrated interrupted fluid propagation, with the formation of a pouch, were classified as abnormal. Cases with unclear visualization of the esophagus or cases that failed to demonstrate either fluid propagation or a pouch were classified as undetermined. Dynamic esophageal patency assessment results were compared with postnatal findings, considered "gold standard." Test performance indices and intra- and interobserver agreements were calculated.

RESULTS:

For 12 months, 130 patients were recruited, and 132 fetuses were scanned. The median gestational age (interquartile range) at the time of scan was 31.4 weeks (29.0-35.3). Of 132 fetuses enrolled, 123 (93.2%) were normal, 8 (6%) were abnormal, and 1 (0.8%) was undetermined. Excluded from test performance analysis were 3 cases that were terminated without postmortem autopsy (1 was abnormal and 2 were normal), and a fourth case was excluded as it was classified as undetermined. The detection rate of esophageal atresia was 100%, with no false-positive or false-negative case. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the dynamic esophageal patency assessment were 100%. The Kappa coefficient was 1 for both inter- and intraobserver agreements (P<.0001). The median time (interquartile range) required to complete the dynamic esophageal patency assessment was 6.00 minutes (3.00-13.25).

CONCLUSION:

The dynamic esophageal patency assessment is a feasible and highly effective method of ascertaining an intact esophagus and detecting esophageal atresia in suspected cases.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ultrasonografía Prenatal / Atresia Esofágica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ultrasonografía Prenatal / Atresia Esofágica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article