Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of implant-level connection in screw-retained fixed partial dentures: A 3-year randomised clinical trial.
Toia, Marco; Stocchero, Michele; Galli, Silvia; Papia, Evaggelia; Wennerberg, Ann; Becktor, Jonas P.
  • Toia M; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Stocchero M; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Galli S; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Papia E; Department of Material Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Wennerberg A; Department of Prosthodontics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Becktor JP; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 33(1): 78-93, 2022 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34617341
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This randomised controlled trial compares the 3-year outcomes, that is, marginal bone-level (MBL) changes and clinical parameters, between an abutment-level (AL) and implant-level (IL) connection for implants with an internal conical connection (ICC) supporting a screw-retained fixed partial denture. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Fifty patients with 119 implants were randomly allocated to either the AL or IL group. Radiographic and clinical examinations were performed after one, two, and 3 years. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the differences between groups.

RESULTS:

The MBL change was not significantly different between the groups at any point. The MBL was 0.12 ± 0.31 mm (AL) and 0.23 ± 0.26 mm (IL) after 1 year; 0.15 ± 0.34 mm (AL) and 0.17 ± 0.22 mm (IL) after 2 years; 0.18 ± 0.39 mm (AL) and 0.15 ± 0.21 mm (IL) after 3 years. The bleeding on probing was 43.44 ± 39.24% (AL) and 58.19 ± 41.20% (IL) after 1 year; 35.78 ± 39.22% (AL) and 50.43 ± 41.49% (IL) after 2 years; 51.27 ± 44.63% (AL) and 49.57 ± 37.31% (IL) after 3 years and was significantly different (p = .025) between 1 and 2 years. The probing depth showed a significant difference at each time point while the plaque was not significant between the groups. The overall technical, biological and prosthetic complication rates were 5.04%, 3.36%, and 16.00%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The MBL change was similar in the groups. The slight differences in the soft tissue complications between the groups are likely not of clinical relevance. An IL connection is considered to be a valid alternative to an AL set-up in ICC implants.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Prótesis Dental de Soporte Implantado Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Prótesis Dental de Soporte Implantado Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article