Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial.
Penson, David F; Armstrong, Andrew J; Concepcion, Raoul S; Agarwal, Neeraj; Olsson, Carl A; Karsh, Lawrence I; Dunshee, Curtis J; Duggan, William; Shen, Qi; Sugg, Jennifer; Haas, Gabriel P; Higano, Celestia S.
  • Penson DF; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. david.penson@vumc.org.
  • Armstrong AJ; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Concepcion RS; The Comprehensive Prostate Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Agarwal N; Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Olsson CA; Accumed Research Associates, Garden City, NY, USA.
  • Karsh LI; The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
  • Dunshee CJ; Urological Associates of Southern Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Duggan W; Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.
  • Shen Q; Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA.
  • Sugg J; Biostatistics, Astellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA.
  • Haas GP; Global Development, Astellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA.
  • Higano CS; Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 25(2): 363-365, 2022 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34621011
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the phase 2, randomized, double-blind STRIVE trial, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). The objective of this protocol-specified subgroup analysis of STRIVE was to investigate the benefit of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide specifically in patients with nmCRPC.

METHODS:

Patients (N = 139) were stratified by disease stage and randomized to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; n = 70) or bicalutamide 50 mg/day plus ADT (n = 69).

RESULTS:

Baseline characteristics of patients with nmCRPC were comparable between groups. At a median of 17 months follow-up, enzalutamide reduced the risk of progression or death by 76% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI 0.14-0.42). Enzalutamide reduced risk of prostate-specific antigen progression by 82% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (HR, 0.18; 95% CI 0.10-0.34). The most frequently reported adverse events by patients receiving enzalutamide were fatigue (36.2%), hot flush (20.3%), decreased appetite (17.4%), dizziness (17.4%), and nausea (17.4%).

CONCLUSIONS:

This STRIVE subgroup analysis of patients with nmCRPC illustrates the benefit of enzalutamide in reducing the risk of progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01664923.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article