Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Phosphate-Lowering Agents in Nondialysis CKD.
Lioufas, Nicole M; Pascoe, Elaine M; Hawley, Carmel M; Elder, Grahame J; Badve, Sunil V; Block, Geoffrey A; Johnson, David W; Toussaint, Nigel D.
  • Lioufas NM; Department of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
  • Pascoe EM; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Hawley CM; Department of Nephrology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Elder GJ; Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Badve SV; Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Block GA; Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Johnson DW; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Toussaint ND; School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 33(1): 59-76, 2022 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34645696
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Benefits of phosphate-lowering interventions on clinical outcomes in patients with CKD are unclear; systematic reviews have predominantly involved patients on dialysis. This study aimed to summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning benefits and risks of noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering treatment in nondialysis CKD.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of RCTs involving noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering therapy compared with placebo, calcium-based binders, or no study medication, in adults with CKD not on dialysis or post-transplant. RCTs had ≥3 months follow-up and outcomes included biomarkers of mineral metabolism, cardiovascular parameters, and adverse events. Outcomes were meta-analyzed using the Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects. Unstandardized mean differences were used as effect sizes for continuous outcomes with common measurement units and Hedge's g standardized mean differences (SMD) otherwise. Odds ratios were used for binary outcomes. Cochrane risk of bias and GRADE assessment determined the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS:

In total, 20 trials involving 2498 participants (median sample size 120, median follow-up 9 months) were eligible for inclusion. Overall, risk of bias was low. Compared with placebo, noncalcium-based phosphate binders reduced serum phosphate (12 trials, weighted mean difference -0.37; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.15 mg/dl, low certainty evidence) and urinary phosphate excretion (eight trials, SMD -0.61; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.31, low certainty evidence), but resulted in increased constipation (nine trials, log odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.83, low certainty evidence) and greater vascular calcification score (three trials, SMD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.77, very low certainty evidence). Data for effects of phosphate-lowering therapy on cardiovascular events (log OR, 0.51; 95% CI, -0.51 to 1.17) and death were scant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Noncalcium-based phosphate-lowering therapy reduced serum phosphate and urinary phosphate excretion, but there was an unclear effect on clinical outcomes and intermediate cardiovascular end points. Adequately powered RCTs are required to evaluate benefits and risks of phosphate-lowering therapy on patient-centered outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fosfatos / Insuficiencia Renal Crónica / Hiperfosfatemia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fosfatos / Insuficiencia Renal Crónica / Hiperfosfatemia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article