Surgical management and outcomes of adhesive small bowel obstruction: teaching versus non-teaching hospitals.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg
; 48(1): 107-112, 2022 Feb.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34775508
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The relationship between surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) and hospital teaching status is not well known. We sought to elucidate the association between hospital teaching status and clinical metrics for ASBO.METHODS:
Using the 2007-2017 California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database, we identified adult ASBO patients hospitalized for surgical intervention. Hospital teaching status was categorized as major teaching (MajT), minor teaching (MinT), and non-teaching (NT). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate risk of death and other adverse outcomes.RESULTS:
Of 25,047 admissions, 15.4% were at MajT, 32.0% at MinT, and 52.6% at NT; 2.9% died. Patients at MajT had longer overall hospital stays (HLOS) than those at MinT or NT (median days 9 vs. 8 vs. 8; p = 0.005), longer post-ASBO procedure HLOS (median days 7 vs. 6 vs. 6; p = 0.0001) and higher rates of small bowel resection (27.1% vs. 21.7% vs. 21.7%; p < 0.0001). Mean time to first surgery at MajT was 3.3 days compared with 2.6 days (p = 0.004) at MinT and NT. Compared with patients at NT, those at MajT were significantly less likely to die (HR 0.62, p < 0.0001), develop pneumonia (HR 0.57, p = 0.001), or experience adverse discharge disposition (HR 0.79, p < 0.0001).CONCLUSION:
Mortality and morbidity of ASBO surgery were reduced at MajT; however, time to surgery, HLOS, and rate of small bowel resection were greater. These findings may guide improvements in the management of ASBO patients.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Adhesivos
/
Obstrucción Intestinal
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Humans
Idioma:
En
Año:
2022
Tipo del documento:
Article