Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Practice of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Surgical Departments in Mecklenburg Western Pomerania, Germany.
Rauch, Julia; Franze, Marco; Patrzyk, Maciej; Heidecke, Claus-Dieter; Schulze, Tobias.
  • Rauch J; Department of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
  • Franze M; Institute of Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.
  • Patrzyk M; Department of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
  • Heidecke CD; Department of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
  • Schulze T; IQTIG-Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen, 10787 Berlin, Germany.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 9(11)2021 Nov 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34828536
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite the growing concern over its potentially severe side effects and considerable economic burden, stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is still frequently prescribed to patients in medical non-intensive care units. Recent data indicate that the situation is similar in surgical departments. Currently, data on the concepts within and regulation of routine SUP practice in surgical departments are sparse. The present study was designed to examine the current practice of SUP in Mecklenburg West Pomerania, Germany, and to identify possible reasons for the dissociation of medical literature and clinical practice.

METHODS:

A questionnaire-based survey was conducted to elucidate current SUP practices in surgical departments of acute care hospitals in Mecklenburg Western Pomerania, Germany.

RESULTS:

In most surgical departments (68%), a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SUP had not been developed. In departments with an existing SOP, 47.6% of responding medical staff members (MSM) with prescribing authority did not know of its existence. Of the MSMs aware of the existence of an SUP-SOP, only 42.9% indicated that they were familiar with its content. Critical re-evaluation of SUP indications upon transfer from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the general hospital ward (GHW) and before hospital discharge was performed frequently or systematically by only about half of the responding MSMs.

DISCUSSION:

In the face of continued massive over-prescription of SUP in the perioperative routine, the development of easy-to-use local guidelines and their strict implementation in the clinical routine, as well as intensified medial education on this subject, may be effective tools to reduce acid-suppressive medication (ASM) associated side effects and economic burden.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article