Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
StimFit-A Data-Driven Algorithm for Automated Deep Brain Stimulation Programming.
Roediger, Jan; Dembek, Till A; Wenzel, Gregor; Butenko, Konstantin; Kühn, Andrea A; Horn, Andreas.
  • Roediger J; Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
  • Dembek TA; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
  • Wenzel G; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Butenko K; Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
  • Kühn AA; Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Horn A; Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Mov Disord ; 37(3): 574-584, 2022 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34837245
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Finding the optimal deep brain stimulation (DBS) parameters from a multitude of possible combinations by trial and error is time consuming and requires highly trained medical personnel.

OBJECTIVE:

We developed an automated algorithm to identify optimal stimulation settings in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS based on imaging-derived metrics.

METHODS:

Electrode locations and monopolar review data of 612 stimulation settings acquired from 31 PD patients were used to train a predictive model for therapeutic and adverse stimulation effects. Model performance was then evaluated within the training cohort using cross-validation and on an independent cohort of 19 patients. We inverted the model by applying a brute-force approach to determine the optimal stimulation sites in the target region. Finally, an optimization algorithm was established to identify optimal stimulation parameters. Suggested stimulation parameters were compared to the ones applied in clinical practice.

RESULTS:

Predicted motor outcome correlated with observed outcome (R = 0.57, P < 10-10 ) across patients within the training cohort. In the test cohort, the model explained 28% of the variance in motor outcome differences between settings. The stimulation site for maximum motor improvement was located at the dorsolateral border of the STN. When compared to two empirical settings, model-based suggestions more closely matched the setting with superior motor improvement.

CONCLUSION:

We developed and validated a data-driven model that can suggest stimulation parameters leading to optimal motor improvement while minimizing the risk of stimulation-induced side effects. This approach might provide guidance for DBS programming in the future. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Parkinson / Núcleo Subtalámico / Estimulación Encefálica Profunda Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Parkinson / Núcleo Subtalámico / Estimulación Encefálica Profunda Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article