Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MOXAIC: A classification of major maxillofacial wounds, concerning 310 cases.
Nguyen, Ha H; Vu, Truc T; Bui, Anh M; Dao, Giang V; Tran, Huyen T T; Do, Linh N.
  • Nguyen HH; Department of Maxillofacial - Plastic - Aesthetic Surgery, Viet-Duc University Hospital, 40 Trang Thi, Hanoi, Viet Nam. Electronic address: nhadr4@gmail.com.
  • Vu TT; Department of Maxillofacial - Plastic - Aesthetic Surgery, Viet-Duc University Hospital, 40 Trang Thi, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  • Bui AM; Department of Maxillofacial - Plastic - Aesthetic Surgery, Viet-Duc University Hospital, 40 Trang Thi, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  • Dao GV; Department of Maxillofacial - Plastic - Aesthetic Surgery, Viet-Duc University Hospital, 40 Trang Thi, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  • Tran HTT; Department of Maxillofacial - Plastic - Aesthetic Surgery, Viet-Duc University Hospital, 40 Trang Thi, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  • Do LN; Department of Maxillofacial - Plastic - Aesthetic Surgery, Viet-Duc University Hospital, 40 Trang Thi, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 123(5): e569-e575, 2022 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34958966
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Although classification for facial fractures have been extensively described in the literature, corresponding systems for major maxillofacial wounds (MMW) are few. We would like to present MOXAIC a new classification system for MMW. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A retrospective study of 310 patients with MMW who underwent emergency operation between January 2005 and December 2016. MMW was defined as a facial wound longer than 10 cm, which includes damage to the craniofacial bone or other important facial structures such as the carotid arteries, facial nerves, parotid gland, Stensen's duct, or the eye. All the patients were followed at least 36 months.

RESULT:

Based on the shape of the wound, the severity, and the mechanism of injury we were able to classify the MMW into five types O, X, A, I, C. For each wound type we then looked at the treatment required and the outcome, objectively classified as good, satisfactory, or poor, concerning anatomical correction, aesthetics, and function. + Type OCircumferential wound 81.6% result good. + Type X-Oblique wound only 48.1% good, despite initial multidisciplinary approach. + Type A-Transverse facial wound 78.1% good. + Type I-Direct wound Immediate airway management and hemorrhage control are important. 48.8% good. + Type CCut wound 88.1% good. The above classification was named MOXAIC which is a mnemonic of 'Maxillofacial' and the five wound types O, X, A, I, C.

CONCLUSION:

This classification is highly reproducible, easy to use, and allows quick treatment work up and prognosis. However, this classification requires further specialist review and study.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas Craneales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas Craneales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article