Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is V-NOTES Hysterectomy as Safe and Feasible as Outpatient Surgery Compared with Vaginal Hysterectomy?
Merlier, Margaux; Collinet, Pierre; Pierache, Adeline; Vandendriessche, David; Delporte, Victoire; Rubod, Chrystèle; Cosson, Michel; Giraudet, Géraldine.
  • Merlier M; Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU de Lille, Loos.
  • Collinet P; Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU de Lille, Loos.
  • Pierache A; ULR 2694-METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Universite de Lille, CHU de Lille, Lille, France.
  • Vandendriessche D; Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU de Lille, Loos.
  • Delporte V; Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU de Lille, Loos.
  • Rubod C; Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU de Lille, Loos.
  • Cosson M; Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU de Lille, Loos.
  • Giraudet G; Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU de Lille, Loos. Electronic address: geraldine.giraudet@chru-lille.fr.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(5): 665-672, 2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35074513
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

The vaginal approach is the reference surgical route to perform hysterectomy for benign pathologies. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) is a new technique that would overcome the limitations of vaginal surgery by allowing a complete exploration of the peritoneal cavity and a constant visual control of the adjacent structures. The aim of this study is to assess the V-NOTES technique compared with vaginal hysterectomy (VH).

DESIGN:

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

French teaching hospital. PATIENTS The first 50 V-NOTES hysterectomies were included successively and compared with the last 50 VH performed from March 2019 to November 2020. The study concerned all patients requiring hysterectomy unless it was for endometriosis or cancer (except for grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma).

INTERVENTIONS:

The baseline characteristics and the surgical outcomes were compared. The main outcome assessed was the performing of outpatient surgery. Secondary end points were uterine weight and intraoperative and postoperative complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

The rate of outpatient surgery did not differ between the 2 surgical techniques (p = .23). The success rate of outpatient management was 77% in the V-NOTES group versus 75% in the VH group (p = .85). There was no difference in surgical outcomes between the 2 groups, except for the rate of salpingectomies or adnexectomies, which was significantly higher in the V-NOTES group, with 100% of patients undergoing one of these procedures, compared with 60% of patients in the vaginal route group (p < .001). There were 2 cases of re-admission in the month following the intervention in the vaginal group and 0 cases in the V-NOTES group.

CONCLUSION:

Hysterectomy by V-NOTES can be performed as a safe and adequate alternative to VH. This surgical route is a good candidate for outpatient management. However, more studies need to be conducted to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article