Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A replication study, systematic review and meta-analysis of automated image-based diagnosis in parkinsonism.
Papathoma, Paraskevi-Evita; Markaki, Ioanna; Tang, Chris; Lilja Lindström, Magnus; Savitcheva, Irina; Eidelberg, David; Svenningsson, Per.
  • Papathoma PE; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Markaki I; Department of Neurology, Danderyd's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Tang C; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. ioanna.markaki@ki.se.
  • Lilja Lindström M; Center of Neurology, Academic Specialist Center, Torsplan, Box 45436, 10431, Stockholm, Sweden. ioanna.markaki@ki.se.
  • Savitcheva I; Center for Neurosciences, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
  • Eidelberg D; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Svenningsson P; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 2763, 2022 02 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35177751
ABSTRACT
Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism early upon symptom onset is often challenging for clinicians and stressful for patients. Several neuroimaging methods have been previously evaluated; however specific routines remain to be established. The aim of this study was to systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of a previously developed 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) based automated algorithm in the diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes, including unpublished data from a prospective cohort. A series of 35 patients prospectively recruited in a movement disorder clinic in Stockholm were assessed, followed by systematic literature review and meta-analysis. In our cohort, automated image-based classification method showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for Parkinson Disease (PD) vs. atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS), in line with the results of the meta-analysis (pooled sensitivity and specificity 0.84; 95% CI 0.79-0.88 and 0.96; 95% CI 0.91 -0.98, respectively). In conclusion, FDG-PET automated analysis has an excellent potential to distinguish between PD and APS early in the disease course and may be a valuable tool in clinical routine as well as in research applications.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico por Computador / Trastornos Parkinsonianos / Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico por Computador / Trastornos Parkinsonianos / Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article