Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review.
Wang, Fangxing; Zheng, Leyu; Theopold, Jan; Schleifenbaum, Stefan; Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard; Osterhoff, Georg.
  • Wang F; ZESBO - Center for Research On Musculoskeletal Systems, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. fw92xadu@studserv.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Zheng L; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 20 Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. fw92xadu@studserv.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Theopold J; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 20 Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Schleifenbaum S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 20 Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Heyde CE; ZESBO - Center for Research On Musculoskeletal Systems, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Osterhoff G; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 20 Haus 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 17(1): 174, 2022 Mar 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35313901
BACKGROUND: For biomechanical investigations on bone or bone implants, bone quality represents an important potential bias. Several techniques for assessing bone quality have been described in the literature. This study aims to systematically summarize the methods currently available for assessing bone quality in human bone tissue, and to discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to April 2021. References will be screened and evaluated for eligibility by two independent reviewers as per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies must apply to bone quality assessment with imaging techniques, mechanical testing modalities, and compositional characterization. The terms used for the systematic search were: "(bone quality". Ti,ab.) AND "(human bone specimens)". RESULTS: The systematic review identified 502 relevant articles in total. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Among them, forty-seven articles investigated several imaging modalities, including radiography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), CT-based techniques, and MRI-based methods. Nineteen articles dealt with mechanical testing approaches, including traditional testing modalities and novel indentation techniques. Nine articles reported the correlation between bone quality and compositional characterization, such as degree of bone mineralization (DBM) and organic composition. A total of 2898 human cadaveric bone specimens were included. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced techniques are playing an increasingly important role due to their multiple advantages, focusing on the assessment of bone morphology and microarchitecture. Non-invasive imaging modalities and mechanical testing techniques, as well as the assessment of bone composition, need to complement each other to provide comprehensive and ideal information on the bone quality of human bone specimens.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Huesos / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Absorciometría de Fotón Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Huesos / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Absorciometría de Fotón Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article