The effect of diabetes on surgical versus percutaneous left main revascularization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Cardiothorac Surg
; 17(1): 61, 2022 Apr 01.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35365159
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The optimal method of coronary revascularization for diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is controversial in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era.METHODS:
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing DES-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for LMCAD in DM patients and tested for effect measure modification (EMM) by diabetes for adverse events. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing CABG to DES-based PCI including DM patients with LMCAD published up to March 1, 2021. We completed separate random-effects meta-analyses for four RCTs (4356 patients, mean follow-up of 4.9 years) and six observational studies (9360 patients, mean follow-up of 5.2 years).RESULTS:
In RCTs among DM patients, DES-based PCI, compared to CABG, was associated with a 30% increased relative risk (RR) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.56, I2 = 0%), while among non-DM patients, there was a 25% increased relative risk (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.44, I2 = 0%) for the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned revascularization (MACCE). There was no evidence of EMM (p-value for interaction = 0.70). The mean weighted SYNTAX score was 25.7. In observational studies, there was no difference between DES-based PCI and CABG for all-cause mortality in patients with DM (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.40, I2 = 0%).CONCLUSIONS:
CABG was superior to PCI for LMCAD in RCTs in DM patients for MACCE. Heart teams may consider DM as one of the many components in the clinical decision-making process, but may not want to consider DM as a primary deciding factor between DES-based PCI and CABG for LMCAD with low to intermediate anatomical complexity in the other coronary arteries. STUDY REGISTRATION CRD42021246931 (PROSPERO).Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Diabetes Mellitus
/
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos
/
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Etiology_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Año:
2022
Tipo del documento:
Article