Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Use of Megestrol Acetate for Cancer-Related Anorexia/Cachexia.
Lim, Yu Liang; Teoh, Seth En; Yaow, Clyve Yu Leon; Lin, Daryl Jimian; Masuda, Yoshio; Han, Ming Xuan; Yeo, Wee Song; Ng, Qin Xiang.
  • Lim YL; MOH Holdings Pte Ltd., 1 Maritime Square, Singapore 099253, Singapore.
  • Teoh SE; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
  • Yaow CYL; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
  • Lin DJ; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
  • Masuda Y; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
  • Han MX; Department of Paramedicine, Monash University Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.
  • Yeo WS; Mount Elizabeth Hospital, 3 Mount Elizabeth, Singapore 228510, Singapore.
  • Ng QX; MOH Holdings Pte Ltd., 1 Maritime Square, Singapore 099253, Singapore.
J Clin Med ; 11(13)2022 Jun 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35807039
Cancer-related anorexia/cachexia is known to be associated with worsened quality of life and survival; however, limited treatment options exist. Although megestrol acetate (MA) is often used off-label to stimulate appetite and improve anorexia/cachexia in patients with advanced cancers, the benefits are controversial. The present meta-analysis aimed to better elucidate the clinical benefits of MA in patients with cancer-related anorexia/cachexia. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, OVID Medline, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases found 23 clinical trials examining the use of MA in cancer-related anorexia. The available randomized, controlled trials were appraised using Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) and they had moderate-to-high risk of bias. A total of eight studies provided sufficient data on weight change for meta-analysis. The studies were divided into high-dose treatment (>320 mg/day) and low-dose treatment (≤320 mg/day). The overall pooled mean change in weight among cancer patients treated with MA, regardless of dosage was 0.75 kg (95% CI = −1.64 to 3.15, τ2 = 9.35, I2 = 96%). Patients who received high-dose MA tended to have weight loss rather than weight gain. There were insufficient studies to perform a meta-analysis for the change in tricep skinfold, midarm circumference, or quality of life measures. MA was generally well-tolerated, except for a clear thromboembolic risk, especially with higher doses. On balance, MA did not appear to be effective in providing the symptomatic improvement of anorexia/cachexia in patients with advanced cancer.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article