Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distance decay 2.0 - A global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities.
Graco-Roza, Caio; Aarnio, Sonja; Abrego, Nerea; Acosta, Alicia T R; Alahuhta, Janne; Altman, Jan; Angiolini, Claudia; Aroviita, Jukka; Attorre, Fabio; Baastrup-Spohr, Lars; Barrera-Alba, José J; Belmaker, Jonathan; Biurrun, Idoia; Bonari, Gianmaria; Bruelheide, Helge; Burrascano, Sabina; Carboni, Marta; Cardoso, Pedro; Carvalho, José C; Castaldelli, Giuseppe; Christensen, Morten; Correa, Gilsineia; Dembicz, Iwona; Dengler, Jürgen; Dolezal, Jiri; Domingos, Patricia; Erös, Tibor; Ferreira, Carlos E L; Filibeck, Goffredo; Floeter, Sergio R; Friedlander, Alan M; Gammal, Johanna; Gavioli, Anna; Gossner, Martin M; Granot, Itai; Guarino, Riccardo; Gustafsson, Camilla; Hayden, Brian; He, Siwen; Heilmann-Clausen, Jacob; Heino, Jani; Hunter, John T; Huszar, Vera L M; Janisová, Monika; Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola, Jenny; Kahilainen, Kimmo K; Kemppinen, Julia; Kozub, Lukasz; Kruk, Carla; Kulbiki, Michel.
  • Graco-Roza C; Department of Geosciences and Geography University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
  • Aarnio S; Laboratory of Ecology and Physiology of Phytoplankton Department of Plant Biology State University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil.
  • Abrego N; Department of Geosciences and Geography University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
  • Acosta ATR; Department of Agricultural Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
  • Alahuhta J; Department of Biological and Environmental Science University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland.
  • Altman J; Department of Science University of Roma Tre Rome Italy.
  • Angiolini C; Geography Research Unit University of Oulu Oulu Finland.
  • Aroviita J; Freshwater Centre Finnish Environment Institute Oulu Finland.
  • Attorre F; Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Pruhonice Czech Republic.
  • Baastrup-Spohr L; Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Czech Republic.
  • Barrera-Alba JJ; Department of Life Sciences University of Siena Siena Italy.
  • Belmaker J; Freshwater Centre Finnish Environment Institute Oulu Finland.
  • Biurrun I; Department of Environmental Biology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy.
  • Bonari G; Freshwater Biological Laboratory Department of Biology University of Copenhagen Universitetsparken København Ø Denmark.
  • Bruelheide H; Departamento de Ciências do Mar Instituto do Mar Universidade Federal de São Paulo. R. Carvalho de Mendonça Santos SP Brazil.
  • Burrascano S; George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences School of Zoology Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel.
  • Carboni M; Steinhardt Museum of Natural History Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel.
  • Cardoso P; Department of Plant Biology and Ecology University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU Bilbao Spain.
  • Carvalho JC; Faculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bozen-Bolzano Bozen-Bolzano Italy.
  • Castaldelli G; Institute for Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle Germany.
  • Christensen M; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
  • Correa G; Department of Environmental Biology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy.
  • Dembicz I; Department of Science University of Roma Tre Rome Italy.
  • Dengler J; Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe) Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
  • Dolezal J; Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe) Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
  • Domingos P; Department of Biology CBMA-Centre for Molecular and Environmental Biology University of Minho Braga Portugal.
  • Erös T; Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology University of Ferrara Ferrara Italy.
  • Ferreira CEL; Morten Chr. Consult Sorø Denmark.
  • Filibeck G; Laboratory of Ecology and Physiology of Phytoplankton Department of Plant Biology State University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil.
  • Floeter SR; Department of Ecology and Environmental Conservation Faculty of Biology Institute of Environmental Biology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland.
  • Friedlander AM; Vegetation Ecology Institute of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR) Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW) Wädenswil Switzerland.
  • Gammal J; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany.
  • Gavioli A; Vegetation Ecology Institute of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR) Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW) Wädenswil Switzerland.
  • Gossner MM; Plant Ecology Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER) Bayreuth Germany.
  • Granot I; Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Pruhonice Czech Republic.
  • Guarino R; Department of Botany Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Ceské Budejovice Czech Republic.
  • Gustafsson C; Laboratory of Phycology and Environmental Education Department of Plant Biology State University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil.
  • Hayden B; Balaton Limnological Research Institute ELKH Tihany Hungary.
  • He S; Reef Systems Ecology and Conservation Lab Departamento de Biologia Marinha Universidade Federal Fluminense Niterói RJ Brazil.
  • Heilmann-Clausen J; Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences (DAFNE) University of Tuscia Viterbo Italy.
  • Heino J; Marine Macroecology and Biogeography Lab Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia CCB Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Florianopolis SC Brazil.
  • Hunter JT; Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology University of Hawai'i Kaneohe Hawaii USA.
  • Huszar VLM; Pristine Seas National Geographic Society Washington District of Columbia USA.
  • Janisová M; Tvärminne Zoological Station University of Helsinki Hanko Finland.
  • Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola J; Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology University of Ferrara Ferrara Italy.
  • Kahilainen KK; Forest Entomology Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland.
  • Kemppinen J; Department of Environmental Systems Science Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Kozub L; George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences School of Zoology Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel.
  • Kruk C; Department STEBICEF - Botanical Unit University of Palermo Palermo Italy.
  • Kulbiki M; Tvärminne Zoological Station University of Helsinki Hanko Finland.
Glob Ecol Biogeogr ; 31(7): 1399-1421, 2022 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35915625
ABSTRACT

Aim:

Understanding the variation in community composition and species abundances (i.e., ß-diversity) is at the heart of community ecology. A common approach to examine ß-diversity is to evaluate directional variation in community composition by measuring the decay in the similarity among pairs of communities along spatial or environmental distance. We provide the first global synthesis of taxonomic and functional distance decay along spatial and environmental distance by analysing 148 datasets comprising different types of organisms and environments. Location Global. Time period 1990 to present. Major taxa studied From diatoms to mammals.

Method:

We measured the strength of the decay using ranked Mantel tests (Mantel r) and the rate of distance decay as the slope of an exponential fit using generalized linear models. We used null models to test whether functional similarity decays faster or slower than expected given the taxonomic decay along the spatial and environmental distance. We also unveiled the factors driving the rate of decay across the datasets, including latitude, spatial extent, realm and organismal features.

Results:

Taxonomic distance decay was stronger than functional distance decay along both spatial and environmental distance. Functional distance decay was random given the taxonomic distance decay. The rate of taxonomic and functional spatial distance decay was fastest in the datasets from mid-latitudes. Overall, datasets covering larger spatial extents showed a lower rate of decay along spatial distance but a higher rate of decay along environmental distance. Marine ecosystems had the slowest rate of decay along environmental distances. Main

conclusions:

In general, taxonomic distance decay is a useful tool for biogeographical research because it reflects dispersal-related factors in addition to species responses to climatic and environmental variables. Moreover, functional distance decay might be a cost-effective option for investigating community changes in heterogeneous environments.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article