Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Efficacy comparison of minimally invasive atlantoaxial mass fusion and open atlantoaxial fusion in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation].
Wang, S L; Kanlin, G L; Xu, N F; Tian, Y L; Jin, J Y; Li, W W.
  • Wang SL; Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Kanlin GL; Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Xu NF; Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Tian YL; Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Jin JY; Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Li WW; Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 102(33): 2583-2589, 2022 Sep 06.
Article en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36058682
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To compare the clinical effects of minimally invasive intermuscular atlantoaxial lateral mass fusion (Mis-PALF) and open atlantoaxial fusion in patients with atlantoaxial dislocation.

Methods:

The clinical data of patients with atlantoaxial dislocation who received Mis-PALF operation (17 cases) or open atlantoaxial fusion (88 cases, as control) in the Third Hospital of Peking University from September 2015 to September 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. In Mis-PALF group, there were 9 males and 8 females, aged (45.8±19.8) years; and there were 48 males and 40 females in the control group, aged (50.0±13.9) years. The operation time, perioperative blood loss, postoperative body temperature, postoperative pain [assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS)], postoperative additional analgesic drugs, postoperative hospitalization time, the improvement rate of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores of spinal cord function in three-months follow-up and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results:

Mis-PALF group had less perioperative blood loss than control group [(111.8±35.9)ml vs (362.9±18.6)ml, P<0.01], shorter hospitalization time [(3.06±0.63) days vs (4.24±0.14) days, P<0.01] and fewer additional analgesic drugs (3/17 vs 56/88, P<0.01). There was no significant difference between the Mis-PALF and control group in operation time [(125±7)min vs (113±8)min, P=0.525], patients with fever(11/17 vs 37/88, P=0.086) or postoperative pain (1/17 vs 13/88, P=0.357), the improvement rate of JOA score (66.9%±28.8% vs 74.2%±28.6%, P=0.409) and complications rate (1/17 vs 3/88, P=1.000).

Conclusion:

Mis-PALF can significantly reduce the perioperative blood loss, shorten the postoperative hospitalization time and the additionally use of analgesic drugs without increasing complications.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Luxaciones Articulares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: Zh Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Luxaciones Articulares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: Zh Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article