Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current status of perioperative temporary mechanical circulatory support during cardiac surgery.
Minhas, Abdul Mannan Khan; Abramov, Dmitry; Chung, Joshua S; Patel, Jay; Mamas, Mamas A; Zieroth, Shelley; Agarwal, Richa; Fudim, Marat; Rabkin, David G.
  • Minhas AMK; Division of Medicine, Forrest General Hospital, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.
  • Abramov D; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
  • Chung JS; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California, USA.
  • Patel J; Loma Linda Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Loma Linda, California, USA.
  • Mamas MA; Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, UK.
  • Zieroth S; Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
  • Agarwal R; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Fudim M; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Rabkin DG; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Card Surg ; 37(12): 4304-4315, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229948
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We sought to determine utilization and outcomes of perioperative temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in the current practice of cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND:

tMCS is an evolving adjunct to cardiac surgery not fully characterized in contemporary practice.

METHODS:

Using the nationwide inpatient sample we retrospectively analyzed hospital discharge data between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019. ICD-10-CM procedure codes were used to identify and divide patient hospitalizations into those who had preoperative tMCS (pre-tMCS) versus tMCS instituted the day of surgery or afterwards (sd/post-tMCS).

RESULTS:

In all, 1,383,520 hospitalizations met inclusion criteria. 86,445 (6.25%) had tMCS. tMCS was utilized in 8.74% of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 2.58% of isolated valve, and 9.71% of valve/CABG; operations. 29,325 (33.9%) had pre-tMCS while 57,120 (66.1%) had sd/post-tMCS. The use of tMCS was associated with greater inpatient mortality (15.66% vs. 1.53%, p < .001), longer length of stay (LOS) (14.4 vs. 8.5 days, p < .001), and higher mean inflation-adjusted costs ($93,040 ± 1038 vs. $51,358 ± 296, p < .001) compared to no use. Inpatient mortality (5.98% vs. 20.63%, p < .001), LOS (13.87 vs. 14.68, p < .001), and cost ($82,621 ± 1152 SEM vs. $98,381 ± 1242) were all significantly lower with pre-tMCS compared to sd/post tMCS. When analyzed separately, mortality was higher with later utilization of tMCS (5.98% pre, 17.1% sd, and 49.05% postsurgical date insertion, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Perioperative tMCS is utilized in 6.25% of modern cardiac surgery, with two-thirds of cases instituted on the day of surgery or afterwards. The use of tMCS is associated with significantly higher mortality, longer LOS, and higher costs. Among patients undergoing tMCS, earlier utilization is associated with better outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article