Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mapping Chinese annual gross primary productivity with eddy covariance measurements and machine learning.
Zhu, Xian-Jin; Yu, Gui-Rui; Chen, Zhi; Zhang, Wei-Kang; Han, Lang; Wang, Qiu-Feng; Chen, Shi-Ping; Liu, Shao-Min; Wang, Hui-Min; Yan, Jun-Hua; Tan, Jun-Lei; Zhang, Fa-Wei; Zhao, Feng-Hua; Li, Ying-Nian; Zhang, Yi-Ping; Shi, Pei-Li; Zhu, Jiao-Jun; Wu, Jia-Bing; Zhao, Zhong-Hui; Hao, Yan-Bin; Sha, Li-Qing; Zhang, Yu-Cui; Jiang, Shi-Cheng; Gu, Feng-Xue; Wu, Zhi-Xiang; Zhang, Yang-Jian; Zhou, Li; Tang, Ya-Kun; Jia, Bing-Rui; Li, Yu-Qiang; Song, Qing-Hai; Dong, Gang; Gao, Yan-Hong; Jiang, Zheng-De; Sun, Dan; Wang, Jian-Lin; He, Qi-Hua; Li, Xin-Hu; Wang, Fei; Wei, Wen-Xue; Deng, Zheng-Miao; Hao, Xiang-Xiang; Li, Yan; Liu, Xiao-Li; Zhang, Xi-Feng; Zhu, Zhi-Lin.
  • Zhu XJ; College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China; Liaoning Panjin Wetland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Shenyang 110866, China.
  • Yu GR; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chin
  • Chen Z; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chin
  • Zhang WK; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
  • Han L; Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, School of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin,300072, China.
  • Wang QF; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chin
  • Chen SP; State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
  • Liu SM; State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
  • Wang HM; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
  • Yan JH; South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China.
  • Tan JL; Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
  • Zhang FW; Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
  • Zhao FH; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
  • Li YN; Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.
  • Zhang YP; Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China.
  • Shi PL; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
  • Zhu JJ; Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
  • Wu JB; Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
  • Zhao ZH; Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
  • Hao YB; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
  • Sha LQ; Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China.
  • Zhang YC; Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, China.
  • Jiang SC; Northeast normal university, Changchun 130024, China.
  • Gu FX; Institute of Environmental and sustainable development in agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
  • Wu ZX; Rubber research institute, Chinese Academy of tropical agricultural sciences, Haikou 570100, China.
  • Zhang YJ; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chin
  • Zhou L; Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China.
  • Tang YK; Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
  • Jia BR; State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
  • Li YQ; Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
  • Song QH; Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China.
  • Dong G; Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China.
  • Gao YH; Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
  • Jiang ZD; Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
  • Sun D; South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China.
  • Wang JL; Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China.
  • He QH; Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Li XH; Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China.
  • Wang F; Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
  • Wei WX; Institute of Subtropical Agriculture Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
  • Deng ZM; Institute of Subtropical Agriculture Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
  • Hao XX; Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.
  • Li Y; Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China.
  • Liu XL; Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
  • Zhang XF; Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • Zhu ZL; Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chin
Sci Total Environ ; 857(Pt 1): 159390, 2023 Jan 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36243072
ABSTRACT
Annual gross primary productivity (AGPP) is the basis for grain production and terrestrial carbon sequestration. Mapping regional AGPP from site measurements provides methodological support for analysing AGPP spatiotemporal variations thereby ensures regional food security and mitigates climate change. Based on 641 site-year eddy covariance measuring AGPP from China, we built an AGPP mapping scheme based on its formation and selected the optimal mapping way, which was conducted through analysing the predicting performances of divergent mapping tools, variable combinations, and mapping approaches in predicting observed AGPP variations. The reasonability of the selected optimal scheme was confirmed by assessing the consistency between its generating AGPP and previous products in spatiotemporal variations and total amount. Random forest regression tree explained 85 % of observed AGPP variations, outperforming other machine learning algorithms and classical statistical methods. Variable combinations containing climate, soil, and biological factors showed superior performance to other variable combinations. Mapping AGPP through predicting AGPP per leaf area (PAGPP) explained 86 % of AGPP variations, which was superior to other approaches. The optimal scheme was thus using a random forest regression tree, combining climate, soil, and biological variables, and predicting PAGPP. The optimal scheme generating AGPP of Chinese terrestrial ecosystems decreased from southeast to northwest, which was highly consistent with previous products. The interannual trend and interannual variation of our generating AGPP showed a decreasing trend from east to west and from southeast to northwest, respectively, which was consistent with data-oriented products. The mean total amount of generated AGPP was 7.03 ± 0.45 PgC yr-1 falling into the range of previous works. Considering the consistency between the generated AGPP and previous products, our optimal mapping way was suitable for mapping AGPP from site measurements. Our results provided a methodological support for mapping regional AGPP and other fluxes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cambio Climático / Ecosistema Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cambio Climático / Ecosistema Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article