Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integration and Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Prospective, Observational Clinical Quality Improvement Study.
Rios-Diaz, Arturo J; Nathan, Shelby L; Cunning, Jessica R; Kozak, Geoffrey M; Messa, Charles A; Whitely, Cutler B; Davis, Harrison D; Thrippleton, Sheri; Broach, Robyn B; Fischer, John P.
  • Rios-Diaz AJ; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Nathan SL; Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University.
  • Cunning JR; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Kozak GM; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicagoand.
  • Messa CA; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Whitely CB; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Davis HD; Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University.
  • Thrippleton S; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Broach RB; From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Fischer JP; Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 151(1): 184-193, 2023 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251864
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represents a critical barrier to their widespread use and poses challenges to workflow and patient satisfaction. The authors sought to implement PRO surveys into surgical practice and identify principles for successful and broader implementation.

METHODS:

Outpatient surgical encounters from 2016 through 2019 related to hernia, breast surgery, or postbariatric body contouring were assessed with the Abdominal Hernia-Q, BREAST-Q, or BODY-Q surveys, respectively. Outcomes were implementation rates per quarter and time to optimal implementation (≥80%). Successful implementation principles were identified during the first implemented PRO instrument and applied to subsequent ones. Logistic regression models were used to estimate increase in rate of implementation per quarter by instrument controlling for clinic volume. Risk-adjusted generalized linear models determined predicted mean differences in total clinic time and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS:

A total of 1206 encounters were identified. The overall survey implementation rate increased from 15% in the first quarter to 90% in the last quarter ( P < 0.01). Abdominal Hernia-Q optimal implementation was reached by 15 months. Principles for successful implementation of PROs were workflow optimization, appropriate patient selection, staff engagement, and electronic survey integration. Consistent application of these principles optimized time to optimal implementation for BREAST-Q [9 months; 18.1% increase in implementation per quarter (95% CI, 1.5 to 37.5); P < 0.01] and BODY-Q [3 months; 56.3% increase in implementation per quarter (95% CI, 26.8 to 92.6); P = 0.03]. Neither patient clinic time ( P = 0.16) nor patient satisfaction differed during the implementation of PROs process ( P = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS:

Prospective implementation of PROs can be achieved in surgical practice without an adverse effect on patient satisfaction or workflow. The proposed principles of implementation may be used to optimize efficiency for implementation of PROs.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article