Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rates of repeated colonoscopies to clean the colon from low-risk and high-risk adenomas: results from the EPoS trials.
Juul, Frederik Emil; Garborg, Kjetil; Nesbakken, Eugen; Løberg, Magnus; Wieszczy, Paulina; Cubiella, Joaquín; Kalager, Mette; Kaminski, Michael F; Erichsen, Rune; Adami, Hans-Olov; Ferlitsch, Monika; Furholm, Siv K B; Zauber, Ann G; Quintero, Enrique; Bugajski, Marek; Holme, Øyvind; Dekker, Evelien; Jover, Rodrigo; Bretthauer, Michael.
  • Juul FE; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Garborg K; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Nesbakken E; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Løberg M; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Wieszczy P; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Cubiella J; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Kalager M; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Kaminski MF; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Erichsen R; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Adami HO; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Ferlitsch M; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Furholm SKB; Gastroenterology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Zauber AG; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Quintero E; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Bugajski M; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Holme Ø; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Dekker E; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Jover R; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland.
  • Bretthauer M; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Gut ; 72(5): 951-957, 2023 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36307178
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

High-quality colonoscopy (adequate bowel preparation, whole-colon visualisation and removal of all neoplastic polyps) is a prerequisite to start polyp surveillance, and is ideally achieved in one colonoscopy. In a large multinational polyp surveillance trial, we aimed to investigate clinical practice variation in number of colonoscopies needed to enrol patients with low-risk and high-risk adenomas in polyp surveillance.

DESIGN:

We retrieved data of all patients with low-risk adenomas (one or two tubular adenomas <10 mm with low-grade dysplasia) and high-risk adenomas (3-10 adenomas, ≥1 adenoma ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia or villous components) in the European Polyp Surveillance trials fulfilling certain logistic and methodologic criteria. We analysed variations in number of colonoscopies needed to achieve high-quality colonoscopy and enter polyp surveillance by endoscopy centre, and by endoscopists who enrolled ≥30 patients.

RESULTS:

The study comprised 15 581 patients from 38 endoscopy centres in five European countries; 6794 patients had low-risk and 8787 had high-risk adenomas. 961 patients (6.2%, 95% CI 5.8% to 6.6%) underwent two or more colonoscopies before surveillance began; 101 (1.5%, 95% CI 1.2% to 1.8%) in the low-risk group and 860 (9.8%, 95% CI 9.2% to 10.4%) in the high-risk group. Main reasons were poor bowel preparation (21.3%) or incomplete colonoscopy/polypectomy (14.4%) or planned second procedure (27.8%). Need of repeat colonoscopy varied between study centres ranging from 0% to 11.8% in low-risk adenoma patients and from 0% to 63.9% in high-risk adenoma patients. On the second colonoscopy, the two most common reasons for a repeat (third) colonoscopy were piecemeal resection (26.5%) and unspecified reason (23.9%).

CONCLUSION:

There is considerable practice variation in the number of colonoscopies performed to achieve complete polyp removal, indicating need for targeted quality improvement to reduce patient burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02319928.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pólipos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Adenoma / Pólipos del Colon Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pólipos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Adenoma / Pólipos del Colon Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article