Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Results of the 2018 Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care survey: current status and outcomes.
Abe, Masanori; Shiga, Hidetoshi; Tatsumi, Hiroomi; Endo, Yoshihiro; Kikuchi, Yoshihiko; Suzuki, Yasushi; Doi, Kent; Nakada, Taka-Aki; Nagafuchi, Hiroyuki; Hattori, Noriyuki; Hirohashi, Nobuyuki; Moriguchi, Takeshi; Yamaga, Osamu; Nishida, Osamu.
  • Abe M; The Survey Committee, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Shiga H; Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Tatsumi H; The Survey Committee, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Endo Y; Emergency and Intensive Care Center, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara, Chiba Japan.
  • Kikuchi Y; The Survey Committee, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Suzuki Y; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido Japan.
  • Doi K; The Survey Committee, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nakada TA; Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga Japan.
  • Nagafuchi H; The Survey Committee, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hattori N; Emergency and Intensive Care Center, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara, Chiba Japan.
  • Hirohashi N; The Survey Committee, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Moriguchi T; Department of Critical Care and Disaster Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Iwate Japan.
  • Yamaga O; The Survey Committee, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nishida O; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ren Replace Ther ; 8(1): 58, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36407492
ABSTRACT

Background:

The Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care (JSBPCC) has reported survey results on blood purification therapy (BPT) for critically ill patients in 2005, 2009, and 2013. To clarify the current clinical status, including details of the modes used, treated diseases, and survival rate, we conducted this cohort study using data from the nationwide JSBPCC registry in 2018.

Methods:

We analyzed data of 2371 patients who underwent BPT in the intensive care units of 43 facilities to investigate patient characteristics, disease severity, modes of BPTs, including the dose of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and hemofilters, treated diseases, and the survival rate for each disease. Disease severity was assessed using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores.

Results:

BPT was performed 2867 times in the 2371 patients. Mean APACHE II and SOFA scores were 23.5 ± 9.4 and 10.0 ± 4.4, respectively. The most frequently used mode of BPT was CRRT (67.4%), followed by intermittent renal replacement therapy (19.1%) and direct hemoperfusion with the polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (7.3%). The most commonly used anticoagulant was nafamostat mesilate (78.6%). Among all patients, the 28-day survival rate was 61.7%. CRRT was the most commonly used mode for many diseases, including acute kidney injury (AKI), multiple organ failure (MOF), and sepsis. The survival rate decreased according to the severity of AKI (P = 0.001). The survival rate was significantly lower in patients with multiple organ failure (MOF) (34.6%) compared with acute lung injury (ALI) (48.0%) and sepsis (58.0%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that sepsis, ALI, acute liver failure, cardiovascular hypotension, central nervous system disorders, and higher APACHE II scores were significant predictors of higher 28-day mortality.

Conclusion:

This large-scale cohort study revealed the current status of BPT in Japan. It was found that CRRT was the most frequently used mode for critically ill patients in Japan and that 28-day survival was lower in those with MOF or sepsis. Further investigations are required to clarify the efficacy of BPT for critically ill patients.Trial Registration UMIN000027678. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41100-022-00445-0.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article