Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity.
Lee, Jasmine R; Terauds, Aleks; Carwardine, Josie; Shaw, Justine D; Fuller, Richard A; Possingham, Hugh P; Chown, Steven L; Convey, Peter; Gilbert, Neil; Hughes, Kevin A; McIvor, Ewan; Robinson, Sharon A; Ropert-Coudert, Yan; Bergstrom, Dana M; Biersma, Elisabeth M; Christian, Claire; Cowan, Don A; Frenot, Yves; Jenouvrier, Stéphanie; Kelley, Lisa; Lee, Michael J; Lynch, Heather J; Njåstad, Birgit; Quesada, Antonio; Roura, Ricardo M; Shaw, E Ashley; Stanwell-Smith, Damon; Tsujimoto, Megumu; Wall, Diana H; Wilmotte, Annick; Chadès, Iadine.
  • Lee JR; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Terauds A; CSIRO, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia.
  • Carwardine J; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Shaw JD; British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Fuller RA; Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Possingham HP; CSIRO, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia.
  • Chown SL; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Convey P; Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Gilbert N; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Hughes KA; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • McIvor E; The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
  • Robinson SA; Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ropert-Coudert Y; British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Bergstrom DM; Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Biersma EM; Constantia Consulting, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Christian C; British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Cowan DA; Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Frenot Y; Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, School of Earth, Atmosphere and Life Sciences and Global Challenges Program, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Jenouvrier S; Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kelley L; Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, La Rochelle Université - CNRS, UMR 7372, Villiers en Bois, France.
  • Lee MJ; Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Lynch HJ; Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Njåstad B; Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, School of Earth, Atmosphere and Life Sciences and Global Challenges Program, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Quesada A; British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Roura RM; Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Shaw EA; Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition, Washington DC, United States of America.
  • Stanwell-Smith D; Centre for Microbial Ecology and Genomics, Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Tsujimoto M; University of Rennes 1, CNRS, EcoBio (Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution)-UMR 6553, Rennes, France.
  • Wall DH; Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Wilmotte A; International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO), South Kingstown, Rhode Island, United States of America.
  • Chadès I; Reel Time Gaming, Taringa, Queensland, Australia.
PLoS Biol ; 20(12): e3001921, 2022 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36548240
Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity faces multiple threats, from invasive species to climate change. Yet no large-scale assessments of threat management strategies exist. Applying a structured participatory approach, we demonstrate that existing conservation efforts are insufficient in a changing world, estimating that 65% (at best 37%, at worst 97%) of native terrestrial taxa and land-associated seabirds are likely to decline by 2100 under current trajectories. Emperor penguins are identified as the most vulnerable taxon, followed by other seabirds and dry soil nematodes. We find that implementing 10 key threat management strategies in parallel, at an estimated present-day equivalent annual cost of US$23 million, could benefit up to 84% of Antarctic taxa. Climate change is identified as the most pervasive threat to Antarctic biodiversity and influencing global policy to effectively limit climate change is the most beneficial conservation strategy. However, minimising impacts of human activities and improved planning and management of new infrastructure projects are cost-effective and will help to minimise regional threats. Simultaneous global and regional efforts are critical to secure Antarctic biodiversity for future generations.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Spheniscidae Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Spheniscidae Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article