Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rapid, sensitive detection of PFOA with smartphone-based flow rate analysis utilizing competitive molecular interactions during capillary action.
Breshears, Lane E; Mata-Robles, Samantha; Tang, Yisha; Baker, Jacob C; Reynolds, Kelly A; Yoon, Jeong-Yeol.
  • Breshears LE; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Mata-Robles S; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Tang Y; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Baker JC; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Reynolds KA; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Yoon JY; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. Electronic address: jyyoon@arizona.edu.
J Hazard Mater ; 446: 130699, 2023 03 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36603430
ABSTRACT
Perfluorinated-alkyl substances (PFAS) pose an unmet threat to the public because they are not strictly monitored and regulated. Perfluorinated-carbon alkyl chains (PFOA), a type of PFAS, at 70 fg/µL is the current health and safety recommendation. Current testing methods for PFOA and PFAS chemicals include HPLC-MS/MS and molecularly imprinted polymers, which are expensive, time-consuming, and require training. In this work, PFOA and PFOS detection was performed on a paper microfluidic chip using competitive interactions between PFOA/PFOS, cellulose fibers, and various reagents (L-lysine, casein, and albumin). Such interactions altered the surface tension at the wetting front and, subsequently, the capillary flow rate. A smartphone captured the videos of this capillary action. The samples flowed through the channel in less than 2 min. Albumin worked the best in detecting PFOA, followed by casein. The detection limit was 10 ag/µL in DI water and 1 fg/µL in effluent (processed) wastewater. Specificity to other non-fluorocarbon surfactants was also tested, using anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), non-ionic Tween 20, and cationic cetrimonium bromide (CTAB). A combination of the reagents successfully distinguished PFOA from all three surfactants at 100% accuracy. This low-cost, handheld assay can be an accessible alternative for rapid in situ estimation of PFOA concentration.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Contaminantes Químicos del Agua / Ácidos Alcanesulfónicos / Fluorocarburos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Contaminantes Químicos del Agua / Ácidos Alcanesulfónicos / Fluorocarburos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article