Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
To drain or not to drain in uro-oncological robotic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Territo, Angelo; Baboudjian, Michael; Diana, Pietro; Gallioli, Andrea; Verri, Paolo; Uleri, Alessandro; Basile, Giuseppe; Tedde, Alessandro; Gaya, Josep M; Huguet, Jordi; Rodriguez-Faba, Oscar; Sanguedolce, Francesco; Sanz Gomez, Isabel; Sanchez Molina, Raul; Palou, Joan; Breda, Alberto.
  • Territo A; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain - territoangelo86@gmail.com.
  • Baboudjian M; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Diana P; Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, Marseille, France.
  • Gallioli A; Department of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Marseille, France.
  • Verri P; Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Uleri A; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Basile G; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinic, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
  • Tedde A; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gaya JM; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Huguet J; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Rodriguez-Faba O; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Sanguedolce F; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Sanz Gomez I; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Sanchez Molina R; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Palou J; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Breda A; Unit of Uro-oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 75(2): 144-153, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36722161
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of routine drainage insertion vs. no drainage in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was conducted through April 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. EVIDENCE

SYNTHESIS:

Eleven studies comprising 8447 RARPs and 1890 RAPNs met our inclusion criteria. Our search strategy did not identify any studies within the RARC framework. In RARP, patients without postoperative drainage had lower rate of postoperative ileus (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.74; P<0.001) and similar low-grade (Clavien 1-2, P=0.41) and high-grade (Clavien ≥3; P=0.85) complications, urinary leakage (P=0.07), pelvic hematoma (P=0.35), symptomatic lymphocele (P=0.13), fever (P=0.25), incisional hernia (P=0.31), reintervention (P=0.57), length of hospital stay (P=0.22), and readmission (P=0.74) compared with routinely drained patients. In RAPN, patients without postoperative drainage had shorter length of hospital stay (mean difference -0.84 days, 95% CI -1.06 to -0.63; P<0.001) and similar low-grade (P=0.94) and high-grade (P=0.31) complications, urinary leakage (P=0.49), hemorrhage (P=0.39), reintervention (P=0.69), and readmission (P=0.20) compared with routinely drained patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

In our study, patients without drainage had similar perioperative course to patients with prophylactic drain insertion after RARP and RAPN. Omission of drain insertion was associated with a lower rate of postoperative ileus for RARP and a shorter hospital stay for RAPN. In the era of robotic surgery, routine drain placement is no longer indicated in unselected patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article