Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Statistical (n, γ ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei.
Lewis, R; Couture, A; Liddick, S N; Spyrou, A; Bleuel, D L; Campo, L Crespo; Crider, B P; Dombos, A C; Guttormsen, M; Kawano, T; Larsen, A C; Lewis, A M; Mosby, S; Perdikakis, G; Prokop, C J; Quinn, S J; Renstrøm, T; Siem, S.
  • Lewis R; National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Couture A; Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Liddick SN; Present Address: Zeno Power Systems, Inc., Washington, DC USA.
  • Spyrou A; Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA.
  • Bleuel DL; National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Campo LC; Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Crider BP; National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Dombos AC; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Guttormsen M; Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Kawano T; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550 USA.
  • Larsen AC; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
  • Lewis AM; National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Mosby S; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Perdikakis G; National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Prokop CJ; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Quinn SJ; Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
  • Renstrøm T; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
  • Siem S; Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA.
Eur Phys J A Hadron Nucl ; 59(3): 42, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36915898
ABSTRACT
Neutron-capture cross sections of neutron-rich nuclei are calculated using a Hauser-Feshbach model when direct experimental cross sections cannot be obtained. A number of codes to perform these calculations exist, and each makes different assumptions about the underlying nuclear physics. We investigated the systematic uncertainty associated with the choice of Hauser-Feshbach code used to calculate the neutron-capture cross section of a short-lived nucleus. The neutron-capture cross section for 73 Zn (n, γ ) 74 Zn was calculated using three Hauser-Feshbach statistical model codes TALYS, CoH, and EMPIRE. The calculation was first performed without any changes to the default settings in each code. Then an experimentally obtained nuclear level density (NLD) and γ -ray strength function ( γ SF ) were included. Finally, the nuclear structure information was made consistent across the codes. The neutron-capture cross sections obtained from the three codes are in good agreement after including the experimentally obtained NLD and γ SF , accounting for differences in the underlying nuclear reaction models, and enforcing consistent approximations for unknown nuclear data. It is possible to use consistent inputs and nuclear physics to reduce the differences in the calculated neutron-capture cross section from different Hauser-Feshbach codes. However, ensuring the treatment of the input of experimental data and other nuclear physics are similar across multiple codes requires a careful investigation. For this reason, more complete documentation of the inputs and physics chosen is important. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0.