Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploiting SMART pass filter deactivation detection to minimize inappropriate subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies: a real-world single-centre experience and management guide.
Monkhouse, Christopher; Wharmby, Amy; Carter, Zoe; Hunter, Ross; Dhinoja, Mehul; Chow, Anthony; Creta, Antonio; Honarbakhsh, Shohreh; Ahsan, Syed; Orini, Michele; Lambiase, Pier D.
  • Monkhouse C; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Wharmby A; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Carter Z; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Hunter R; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Dhinoja M; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Chow A; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Creta A; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Honarbakhsh S; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Ahsan S; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Orini M; Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
  • Lambiase PD; Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London (UCL), 62 Huntley Street, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
Europace ; 25(5)2023 05 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37001913
AIMS: The SMART Pass™ (SP) algorithm is a high-pass filter that aims to reduce inappropriate therapy (IT) in subcutaneous internal cardiac defibrillator (S-ICD), but SP can deactivate due to low amplitude sensed R waves or asystole. The association between IT and SP deactivation and management strategies were evaluated, hypothesizing SP deactivation increases the risk of IT and device re-programming, or lead/generator re-positioning could reduce this risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective single-centre audit of Emblem™ S-ICD devices implanted 2016 to 2020 utilizing health records and remote monitoring data. Cox regression models evaluated associations between SP deactivation and IT. A total of 348 patients (27 ± 16.6 months follow-up) were studied: 73% primary prevention. Thirty-eight patients (11.8%) received 83 shocks with 27 patients (7.8%) receiving a total of 44 IT. Causes of IT were oversensing (98%) and aberrantly conducted atrial fibrillation (2%). SP deactivation occurred in 32 of 348 patients (9%) and was significantly associated with increased risk of IT (hazard ratio 5.36, 95% CI 2.37-12.13). SP deactivation was due to low amplitude R waves (94%), associated with a higher defibrillation threshold at implant and presence of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. No further IT occurred 16 ± 15.5 months after corrective interventions, with changing the sensing vector being successful in 59% of cases. CONCLUSION: To reduce the risk of IT, the cause of the SP deactivation should be investigated, and appropriate reprogramming, device, or lead modifications made. Utilizing the alert for SP deactivation and electrograms could pro-actively prevent IT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Desfibriladores Implantables / Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Desfibriladores Implantables / Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article