Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of international guidelines on the management of twin pregnancy.
Oliver, E; Navaratnam, K; Gent, J; Khalil, A; Sharp, A.
  • Oliver E; School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Navaratnam K; Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Gent J; Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
  • Khalil A; Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Hospital, St George's University of London, UK; Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, UK.
  • Sharp A; Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: a.sharp@liverpool.ac.uk.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 285: 97-104, 2023 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37087836
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To review current international clinical guidelines on the antenatal and intrapartum management of twin pregnancies, examining areas of consensus and conflict.

METHODS:

We conducted a database search using Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL and ERCI Guidelines website. Guidelines were screened for eligibility using our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those deemed eligible were quality assessed using the AGREE II tool and relevant data was extracted.

RESULTS:

We identified 21 relevant guidelines from 16 countries including two international society guidelines. There was consensus in determination of chorionicity and amnionicity within the first trimester, fetal anomaly scan between 18 and 22 weeks and the recommended screening for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). For those that provided intrapartum guidance, there was agreement in recommending caesarean section to deliver monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twins, epidural anaesthesia for intrapartum analgesia and the use of cardiotocography (CTG) for intrapartum fetal monitoring. The main areas of conflict included cervical length screening, frequency of ultrasound surveillance, timing of delivery of dichorionic twin pregnancies and circumstances for recommending vaginal delivery. There was a lack of advice on intrapartum management.

CONCLUSIONS:

This review has highlighted the need for unified international guidance on the management of twin pregnancy. Comparisons of current guidance demonstrates a lack of confidence in the management of labour in twin pregnancies. Further evidence on intrapartum care of twin pregnancies is needed to inform practice guidelines and improve both short and long term maternal and fetal outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cesárea / Embarazo Gemelar Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cesárea / Embarazo Gemelar Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article