Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the skeletodental effects of miniscrew-anchored and tooth-anchored facemask treatment in growing patients with skeletal class III malocclusions.
Choi, Youn-Kyung; Park, Jung Joo; Jeon, Hyeran Helen; Kim, Yong-Il.
  • Choi YK; Department of Orthodontics, Biomedical research institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • Park JJ; Private Practice, Incheon, Korea.
  • Jeon HH; Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Kim YI; Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 26(4): 695-703, 2023 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37272219
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the skeletal and dental effects of the miniscrew-anchored facemask in skeletal Class III growing patients and compare them with those of conventional tooth-anchored facemasks.

METHODS:

Retrospectively a total of 50 patients with skeletal Class III (mean ANB -1.12°) were investigated and divided into two groups according to the treatment modality. Twenty-five patients were treated using the conventional tooth-anchored facemask (T group mean age 9.3 ± 1.1 years, mean ANB -0.93°) whereas the other 25 were treated using a miniscrew-anchored facemask (M group mean age 9.7 ± 1.3 years. mean ANB -1.61°). Two miniscrews were placed on the palate for bone anchorage. In both T and M groups, facemasks applied a force of 20-30° down on the occlusal plane, and the force increased from 200 g to 300-350 g per side throughout the treatments. The patients were instructed to wear facemasks for at least 14 h per day. A total of 16 angular and 11 linear cephalometric measurements were analysed to determine the skeletal and dental changes before and after facemask treatment. A paired t-test was used to verify the effects before and after treatment in each group.

RESULTS:

All miniscrews were well maintained during treatment. The values of SNA, SN-ANS, ANB and A to N-Perp, which indicate anterior protraction of the maxilla, were significantly higher in the M group compared with the T group (P < .05). Proclination of the maxillary incisors, extrusion and mesialization of the maxillary molars were significantly greater in the T group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Miniscrew-anchored facemask treatment increased the amount of maxillary protraction and reduced the dental side effects compared with conventional tooth-anchored facemask treatment in growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Maloclusión de Angle Clase III / Máscaras Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Maloclusión de Angle Clase III / Máscaras Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article