Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of a portable Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging and a snapscan SWIR hyperspectral imaging for evaluation of meat authenticity.
Dashti, Abolfazl; Müller-Maatsch, Judith; Roetgerink, Emma; Wijtten, Michiel; Weesepoel, Yannick; Parastar, Hadi; Yazdanpanah, Hassan.
  • Dashti A; Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Müller-Maatsch J; Forensic Toxicology Department, Legal Medicine Research Center, Legal Medicine Organization, Tehran, Iran.
  • Roetgerink E; Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Wijtten M; Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Weesepoel Y; Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Parastar H; Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Yazdanpanah H; Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Food Chem X ; 18: 100667, 2023 Jun 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37397218
The performance of visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging (Vis-NIR-HSI) (400-1000 nm) and shortwave infrared hyperspectral imaging (SWIR-HSI) (1116-1670 nm) combined with different classification and regression (linear and non-linear) multivariate methods were assessed for meat authentication. In Vis-NIR-HSI, total accuracies in the prediction set for SVM and ANN-BPN (the best classification models) were 96 and 94 % surpassing the performance of SWIR-HSI with 88 and 89 % accuracy, respectively. In Vis-NIR-HSI, the best-obtained coefficient of determinations for the prediction set (R2p) were 0.99, 0.88, and 0.99 with root mean square error in prediction (RMSEP) of 9, 24 and 4 (%w/w) for pork in beef, pork in lamb and pork in chicken, respectively. In SWIR-HSI, the best-obtained R2p were 0.86, 0.77, and 0.89 with RMSEP of 16, 23 and 15 (%w/w) for pork in beef, pork in lamb and pork in chicken, respectively. The results ascertain that Vis-NIR-HSI coupled with multivariate data analysis has better performance rather than SWIR-HIS.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article