Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical factors distinguishing renal infarction from acute pyelonephritis: A randomly matched retrospective case-control study.
Woo, Seungho; Seo, Donghee; Cho, Young Soon; Lee, Jae Wook; Moon, Jieun; Nah, Sangun; Han, Sangsoo.
  • Woo S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea.
  • Seo D; Department of Family Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho YS; Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JW; Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea.
  • Moon J; Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Trial Center, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea.
  • Nah S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: 125271@schmc.ac.kr.
  • Han S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: brayden0819@schmc.ac.kr.
Am J Emerg Med ; 72: 88-94, 2023 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37499555
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Renal infarction (RI) is rare but clinically important because the appropriate treatment depends on the time of diagnosis. RI is often misdiagnosed as acute pyelonephritis (APN) because both diseases have nonspecific symptoms such as flank pain and abdominal pain. We identified predictors for distinguishing RI from APN.

METHODS:

The data of patients visited the emergency department and diagnosed with RI or APN from March 2016 to May 2020 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged under 18 years, with a history of trauma, or incomplete medical records were excluded. Using a matching ratio of 15, RI patients were randomly matched to APN patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that could distinguish RI from APN. In addition, we constructed a decision tree to identify patterns of risk factors and develop prediction algorithms.

RESULTS:

The RI and APN groups included 55 and 275 patients, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male sex (OR, 6.161; p = 0.009), atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR, 14.303; p = 0.021), costovertebral angle tenderness (CVAT) (OR, 0.106; p < 0.001), aspartate transaminase (AST) level > 21.50 U/L (OR, 19.820; p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) level < 19.75 mg/L (OR, 10.167; p < 0.001), and pyuria (OR, 0.037; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with RI distinguishing from APN.

CONCLUSION:

Male sex, AF, no CVAT, AST level > 21.50 U/L, CRP level < 19.75 mg/L, and no pyuria were significant factors that could distinguish RI from APN.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pielonefritis / Enfermedades Ureterales / Traumatismos Abdominales / Enfermedades Renales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Aged / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pielonefritis / Enfermedades Ureterales / Traumatismos Abdominales / Enfermedades Renales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Aged / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article