Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AGR2 and FOXA1 as prognostic markers in ER-positive breast cancer.
Zhou, Meng; Gan, Xing-Li; Ren, Yue-Xiang; Chen, Qian-Xin; Yang, Yuan-Zhong; Weng, Zi-Jin; Zhang, Xiao-Fang; Guan, Jie-Xia; Tang, Lu-Ying; Ren, Ze-Fang.
  • Zhou M; School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2Nd Rd, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
  • Gan XL; School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2Nd Rd, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
  • Ren YX; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou, 510630, China. 13787713435@163.com.
  • Chen QX; School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2Nd Rd, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
  • Yang YZ; The Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Weng ZJ; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
  • Zhang XF; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
  • Guan JX; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
  • Tang LY; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou, 510630, China. tangly@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
  • Ren ZF; School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2Nd Rd, Guangzhou, 510080, China. renzef@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 743, 2023 Aug 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37568077
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The prognostic role of either forkhead box A1 (FOXA1) or anterior gradient 2 (AGR2) in breast cancer has been found separately. Considering that there were interplays between them depending on ER status, we aimed to assess the statistical interaction between AGR2 and FOXA1 on breast cancer prognosis and examine the prognostic role of the combination of them by ER status.

METHODS:

AGR2 and FOXA1 expression in tumor tissues were evaluated with tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry in 915 breast cancer patients with follow up data. The expression levels of these two markers were treated as binary variables, and many different cutoff values were tried for each marker. Survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between AGR2, FOXA1 and prognosis, and the statistical interaction between them on the prognosis was assessed on multiplicative scale.

RESULTS:

Statistical interaction between AGR2 and FOXA1 on the PFS was significant with all the cutoff points in ER-positive breast cancer patients but not ER-negative ones. Among ER-positive patients, the poor prognostic role of the high level of FOXA1 was significant only in patients with the low level of AGR2, and vice versa. When AGR2 and FOXA1 were considered together, patients with low levels of both markers had significantly longer PFS compared with all other groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was a statistical interaction between AGR2 and FOXA1 on the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer. The combination of AGR2 and FOXA1 was a more useful marker for the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article