Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines in Identifying Pathogenic Germline Variants Among Unselected Patients with Prostate Cancer: The PROCLAIM Trial.
Shore, Neal; Gazi, Mukaram; Pieczonka, Christopher; Heron, Sean; Modh, Rishi; Cahn, David; Belkoff, Laurence H; Berger, Aaron; Mazzarella, Brian; Veys, Joseph; Idom, Charles; Morris, David; Jayram, Gautam; Engelman, Alexander; Bukkapatnam, Raviender; Dato, Paul; Bevan-Thomas, Richard; Cornell, Robert; Wise, David R; Hardwick, Mary Kay; Hernandez, Ryan D; Rojahn, Susan; Layman, Paige; Hatchell, Kathryn E; Heald, Brandie; Nussbaum, Robert L; Nielsen, Sarah M; Esplin, Edward D.
  • Shore N; Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA. Electronic address: nshore@auclinics.com.
  • Gazi M; University Urology Associates of New Jersey, Hamilton, NJ, USA.
  • Pieczonka C; Associated Medical Professionals, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Heron S; Advanced Urology Institute, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
  • Modh R; Advanced Urology Institute, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
  • Cahn D; Colorado Urology, Lakewood, CO, USA.
  • Belkoff LH; MidLantic Urology, Bala Cynwyd, PA, USA.
  • Berger A; Associated Urological Specialists, Chicago Ridge, IL, USA.
  • Mazzarella B; Urology Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Veys J; North Georgia Urology, Dalton, GA, USA.
  • Idom C; North Georgia Urology, Dalton, GA, USA.
  • Morris D; Urology Associates, P.C., Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Jayram G; Urology Associates, P.C., Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Engelman A; TGH Cancer Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Bukkapatnam R; Florida Urology Partners, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Dato P; Genesis Healthcare Partners, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Bevan-Thomas R; Urology Partners, Arlington, TX, USA.
  • Cornell R; Urosurgery Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Wise DR; Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Hardwick MK; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Hernandez RD; Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Rojahn S; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Layman P; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Hatchell KE; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Heald B; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Nussbaum RL; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA; Volunteer Faculty, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Nielsen SM; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Esplin ED; Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 6(5): 477-483, 2023 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37574391
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prostate cancer (PCa) patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in cancer predisposition genes may be eligible for U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies, clinical trials, or enhanced screening. Studies suggest that eligible patients are missing genetics-informed care due to restrictive testing criteria.

OBJECTIVE:

To establish the prevalence of actionable PGVs among prospectively accrued, unselected PCa patients, stratified by their guideline eligibility. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Consecutive, unselected PCa patients were enrolled at 15 sites in the USA from October 2019 to August 2021, and had multigene cancer panel testing. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

Correlates between the prevalence of PGVs and clinician-reported demographic and clinical characteristics were examined. RESULTS AND

LIMITATIONS:

Among 958 patients (median [quartiles] age at diagnosis 65 [60, 71] yr), 627 (65%) had low- or intermediate-risk disease (grade group 1, 2, or 3). A total of 77 PGVs in 17 genes were identified in 74 patients (7.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2-9.6%). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of PGVs among patients who met the 2019 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Prostate criteria (8.8%, 43/486, 95% CI 6.6-12%) versus those who did not (6.6%, 31/472, 95% CI 4.6-9.2%; odds ratio 1.38, 95% CI 0.85-2.23), indicating that these criteria would miss 42% of patients (31/74, 95% CI 31-53%) with PGVs. The criteria were less effective at predicting PGVs in patients from under-represented populations. Most PGVs (81%, 60/74) were potentially clinically actionable. Limitations include the inability to stratify analyses based on individual ethnicity due to low numbers of non-White patients with PGVs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results indicate that almost half of PCa patients with PGVs are missed by current testing guidelines. Comprehensive germline genetic testing should be offered to all patients with PCa. PATIENT

SUMMARY:

One in 13 patients with prostate cancer carries an inherited variant that may be actionable for the patient's current care or prevention of future cancer, and could benefit from expanded testing criteria.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article