Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in the Pupillary Responses to Evening Light between Children and Adolescents.
Hartstein, Lauren E; LeBourgeois, Monique K; Durniak, Mark T; Najjar, Raymond P.
  • Hartstein LE; Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • LeBourgeois MK; Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Durniak MT; Excelitas Technologies, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Najjar RP; Center for Innovation & Precision Eye Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Aug 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37645820
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To assess differences in the pupillary light responses (PLRs) to blue and red evening lights between children and adolescents.

Methods:

Forty healthy participants (8-9 years, n=21; 15-16 years, n=19) completed a PLR assessment 1 h before their habitual bedtime. After a 1 h dim-light adaptation period (<1 lux), baseline pupil diameter was measured in darkness for 30 s, followed by a 10 s exposure to 3.0×1013 photons/cm2/s of either red (627 nm) or blue (459 nm) light, and a 40 s recovery in darkness to assess pupillary re-dilation. Subsequently, participants underwent 7 min of dim-light re-adaptation followed by an exposure to the other light condition. Lights were counterbalanced across participants.

Results:

Across both age groups, maximum pupil constriction was significantly greater (p< 0.001, ηp2=0.48) and more sustained (p< 0.001, ηp2=0.41) during exposure to blue compared to red light. For adolescents, the post-illumination pupillary response (PIPR), a hallmark of melanopsin function, was larger after blue compared with red light (p= 0.02, d=0.60). This difference was not observed in children. Across light exposures, children had larger phasic (p< 0.01, ηp2=0.20) and maximal (p< 0.01, ηp2=0.22) pupil constrictions compared to adolescents.

Conclusions:

Blue light elicited a greater and more sustained pupillary response than red light across participants. However, the overall amplitude of the rod/cone-driven phasic response was greater in children than in adolescents. Our findings using the PLR highlight a higher sensitivity to evening light in children compared to adolescents, and continued maturation of the human non-visual photoreception/system throughout development.
Palabras clave