Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Bicêtre occlusion scale is well suited to assess the efficacy of the Contour embolization device.
Caroff, Jildaz; Cortese, Jonathan; D'Argento, Francesco; Popica, Dan Adrian; Mihalea, Cristian; Spelle, Laurent.
  • Caroff J; Department of Interventional Neuroradiology - NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, APHP, Paris Saclay University, 78 Rue du General Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM U1176, Bicêtre Hospital, 78 Rue du General Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. Electronic address: jildaz.caroff@
  • Cortese J; Department of Interventional Neuroradiology - NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, APHP, Paris Saclay University, 78 Rue du General Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Paris-Saclay University, Faculty of Medicine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
  • D'Argento F; UOSD Neuroradiologia Interventistica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Popica DA; Department of Interventional Neuroradiology - NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, APHP, Paris Saclay University, 78 Rue du General Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
  • Mihalea C; Department of Interventional Neuroradiology - NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, APHP, Paris Saclay University, 78 Rue du General Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
  • Spelle L; Department of Interventional Neuroradiology - NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, APHP, Paris Saclay University, 78 Rue du General Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Paris-Saclay University, Faculty of Medicine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
J Neuroradiol ; 51(2): 220-223, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652262
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Contour Embolization Device (CED) is typically assessed using coiling angiographic outcomes. However, these scales do not address device-specific problematics. We evaluated the usability of the Bicêtre occlusion scale (BOS) with the CED.

RESULTS:

BOS scores can be analyzed as BOSS 0 = no residual flow, BOSS 1 = residual flow inside the CED but with complete neck-sealing, BOSS 2 = neck-remnant, BOSS 3 = aneurysm-remnant, BOSS 1 + 3 = contrast filling inside the device and aneurysmal sac without complete neck-sealing.

CONCLUSION:

BOS usage should be encouraged as it provides a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanism of CED occlusion, especially considering the potential prognostic value of the neck sealing assessment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Search on Google

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aneurisma Intracraneal / Embolización Terapéutica / Procedimientos Endovasculares Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
Texto completo
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Search on Google

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aneurisma Intracraneal / Embolización Terapéutica / Procedimientos Endovasculares Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article