Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acute respiratory distress syndrome: potential of therapeutic interventions effective in treating progression from COVID-19 to treat progression from other illnesses-a systematic review.
Ragel, Emma J; Harris, Lynda K; Campbell, Richard A.
  • Ragel EJ; Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Harris LK; Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Campbell RA; Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 10(1)2023 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37657844
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe form of lung injury, rendering gaseous exchange insufficient, leading to respiratory failure. Despite over 50 years of research on the treatment of ARDS when developed from illnesses such as sepsis and pneumonia, mortality remains high, and no robust pharmacological treatments exist. The progression of SARS-CoV-2 infections to ARDS during the recent global pandemic led to a surge in the number of clinical trials on the condition. Understandably, this explosion in new research focused on COVID-19 ARDS (CARDS) rather than ARDS when developed from other illnesses, yet differences in pathology between the two conditions mean that optimal treatment for them may be distinct.

AIM:

The aim of the present work is to assess whether new therapeutic interventions that have been developed for the treatment of CARDS may also hold strong potential in the treatment of ARDS when developed from other illnesses. The study objectives are achieved through a systematic review of clinical trials.

RESULTS:

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the identification of various therapeutic interventions for CARDS, some but not all of which are optimal for the management of ARDS. Interventions more suited to CARDS pathology include antithrombotics and biologic agents, such as cytokine inhibitors. Cell-based therapies, on the other hand, show promise in the treatment of both conditions, attributed to their broad mechanisms of action and the overlap in the clinical manifestations of the conditions. A shift towards personalised treatments for both CARDS and ARDS, as reflected through the increasing use of biologics, is also evident.

CONCLUSIONS:

As ongoing CARDS clinical trials progress, their findings are likely to have important implications that alter the management of ARDS in patients that develop the condition from illnesses other than COVID-19 in the future.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article