Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is associated with poor prognosis in peritoneal dialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Zhang, Fengping; Shi, Taotao; Feng, Xiaoran; Shi, Yunying; Zhang, Guilin; Liu, Yu; Fu, Ping.
  • Zhang F; Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Shi T; Department of Nephrology, Jiujiang NO.1 People's Hospital, Jiujiang, China.
  • Feng X; Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Shi Y; Department of Nephrology, Jiujiang NO.1 People's Hospital, Jiujiang, China.
  • Zhang G; Department of Nephrology, Jiujiang NO.1 People's Hospital, Jiujiang, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Fu P; Department of Nephrology, The NO.1 Affiliatedffiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
BMC Nephrol ; 24(1): 288, 2023 09 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37775768
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of diabetic peritoneal dialysis patients is poor. HbA1c serves as a crucial indicator for monitoring blood glucose control in patients with diabetes. Nevertheless, the relationship between visit-to-visit HbA1c variability and prognosis in peritoneal dialysis with diabetes remains unclear. METHODS: All participants were categorized into 3 groups based on the HbA1c variability score (HVS), which is the frequency of 0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) alter in visit-to-visit HbA1c values. Then, the hazard ratio to HVS with all-cause mortality was analyzed using the Cox hazard model, followed by the Fine-Gray competing risk model for major adverse cardiovascular events. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were conducted to ascertain the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty patients with type 2 diabetes were finally enrolled in this study from 2,855 participants with a mean age of 56.9 ± 14.6 years and a median follow-up time of 44 months [IQR: 27-70], death occurred in 496 (60.2%) individuals. Compared with the lowest category (HVS < 1/3) after being adjusted by potential confounding factors, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 4.59 (3.74-5.64) and the sub-distribution hazard ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events was 1.91 (1.46-2.51) of the highest category (HVS ≥ 2/3). Subgroup interaction and sensitivity analysis, including the adjustment for variables such as time-weighted average HbA1c, HbA1c measurement times and expansion, confirmed the reliability of the results. CONCLUSION: The HVS is related to the risk of poor prognosis in peritoneal dialysis with type 2 diabetes mellitus, independently of clinical multiple variables, and is a novel indicator with clinical guidance.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Diálisis Peritoneal / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Diálisis Peritoneal / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article