Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The assessment of the clinical impact of using a single set of radiotherapy planning data for two kilovoltage therapy units.
Peters, Iliana; Nelson, Vinod; Deshpande, Shrikant; Walker, Amy; Hiatt, Joshua; Roach, Dale; Erven, Tania; Rajapakse, Satya; Gray, Alison.
  • Peters I; South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia. iliana.peters@health.nsw.gov.au.
  • Nelson V; South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Deshpande S; South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Walker A; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
  • Hiatt J; South West Sydney Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Roach D; South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Erven T; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
  • Rajapakse S; South West Sydney Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Gray A; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Phys Eng Sci Med ; 47(1): 49-59, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37843767
ABSTRACT
Kilovoltage therapy units are used for superficial radiotherapy treatment delivery. Peer reviewed studies for MV linear accelerators describe tolerances to dosimetrically match multiple linear accelerators enabling patient treatment on any matched machine. There is an absence of literature on using a single planning data set for multiple kilovoltage units which have limited ability for beam adjustment. This study reviewed kilovoltage dosimetry and treatment planning scenarios to evaluate the feasibility of using ACPSEM annual QA tolerances to determine whether two units (of the same make and model) were dosimetrically matched. The dosimetric characteristics, such as measured half value layer (HVL), percentage depth dose (PDD), applicator factor and output variation with stand-off distance for each kV unit were compared to assess the agreement. Independent planning data based on the measured HVL for each beam energy from each kV unit was prepared. Monitor unit (MU) calculations were performed using both sets of planning data for approximately 200 clinical scenarios and compared with an overall agreement between units of < 2%. Additionally, a dosimetry measurement comparison was completed at each site for a subset of nine scenarios. All machine characterisation measurements were within the ACPSEM Annual QA tolerances, and dosimetric testing was within 2.5%. This work demonstrates that using a single set of planning data for two kilovoltage units is feasible, resulting in a clinical impact within published uncertainty.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiometría / Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiometría / Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article